Re: [Mono-list] Mono 1.9 on CentOS 5 (RHEL 5)

2008-04-18 Thread Paul F. Johnson
Hi, > Thank you very much for your response. The RHEL5 ones are for v 1.2.4 > and I'd prefer to be on the very latest. Also they don't come with > mono-basic, I managed to find an old fedora core 5 version 1.2.4 and > installed that. Problem is with this setup that some VB pages work but > n

Re: [Mono-list] Mono 1.9 on CentOS 5 (RHEL 5)

2008-04-16 Thread Lyle - CosmicPerl.com Support
Paul F. Johnson wrote: > Why not just use the ones supplied in either Rawhide (Fedora) or RHEL5? > The way it's done with Fedora is that things go in /lib or /lib64 > (depending on architecture) as well as having scripts in different > places for the likes of mod_mono and xsp. > > TTFN > > Paul > M

Re: [Mono-list] Mono 1.9 on CentOS 5 (RHEL 5)

2008-04-16 Thread Paul F. Johnson
Hi, > Why did I have so many problems with the Novell ones?? Is there a big > fat readme file I'm missing? > > > I hope I posted this to the right place, if not please point me in the > right direction. Why not just use the ones supplied in either Rawhide (Fedora) or RHEL5? The way it's done

[Mono-list] Mono 1.9 on CentOS 5 (RHEL 5)

2008-04-16 Thread Lyle - CosmicPerl.com Support
Hi All, I got mono working without much more than installing the CentOS RPM's. This worked great until I wanted VB and couldn't find an RPM for the right version. In my searching I came across Novell's repository which appeared to have RPM's for the latest version 1.9 for almost all the Linux