Re: [Mono-list] MySQL Connector/NET vs Mono

2005-09-16 Thread Bernhard Herzog
nhard   - Original Message - From: Reggie Burnett To: 'Bernhard Herzog' ; 'Daniel Morgan' ; Mono-list@lists.ximian.com Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 8:08 PM Subject: RE: [Mono-list] MySQL Connector/NET vs Mono That is the define howeve

Re: [Mono-list] MySQL Connector/NET vs Mono

2005-09-16 Thread Rafael George
On 9/8/05, Miguel de Icaza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello,> I had lots of problems using the MySQL Connector under Mono and> eventually reverted to using ByteFX - supported or not!If people want to submit fixes for ByteFX.Data, we will be glad to take those patches in.  Since ByteFX is still LGPL

Re: [Mono-list] MySQL Connector/NET vs Mono

2005-09-08 Thread A Rafael D Teixeira
AFAIK, the p/invokes are there but there is logic to guarantee that they are only called when the platform is Windows, so they don't cause any adverse effect when run on Linux/MacOSX with Mono. :) On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 07:55 -0700, Joe Audette wrote: > I have been using the MySQL Connector in m

Re: [Mono-list] MySQL Connector/NET vs Mono

2005-09-08 Thread Bernhard Herzog
Reggie Burnett; 'Daniel Morgan'; Mono-list@lists.ximian.comSubject: Re: [Mono-list] MySQL Connector/NET vs Mono Aha, that's good news. I just downloaded the source and have seen that there is support for Unix Sockets, right?   What do I need to com

RE: [Mono-list] MySQL Connector/NET vs Mono

2005-09-08 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, > Win32 specific code was added to the connector to work around > limitations in the Socket class. I am not yet shipping Mono tested > binaries (though I am working on including this) and so it was an > oversight that 1.0.5 shipped broken on Mono. I will correct it in the > next release.

Re: [Mono-list] MySQL Connector/NET vs Mono

2005-09-08 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, > I had lots of problems using the MySQL Connector under Mono and > eventually reverted to using ByteFX - supported or not! If people want to submit fixes for ByteFX.Data, we will be glad to take those patches in. Since ByteFX is still LGPL licensed. > > However, If Joe's way works, the

Re: [Mono-list] MySQL Connector/NET vs Mono

2005-09-08 Thread Brion Vibber
Reggie Burnett wrote: Win32 specific code was added to the connector to work around limitations in the Socket class. I am not yet shipping Mono tested binaries (though I am working on including this) and so it was an oversight that 1.0.5 shipped broken on Mono. I will correct it in the next rel

Re: [Mono-list] MySQL Connector/NET vs Mono

2005-09-08 Thread Brion Vibber
Daniel Morgan wrote: If people are having problems running the MySQL Connector/NET on Mono, people could report these bugs to MySQL's bug database or wherever it is or a message to their public forum or mailing list to let them know. It was reported there a week ago, I added more details last n

RE: [Mono-list] MySQL Connector/NET vs Mono

2005-09-08 Thread Reggie Burnett
Mono-list@lists.ximian.comSubject: Re: [Mono-list] MySQL Connector/NET vs Mono Aha, that's good news. I just downloaded the source and have seen that there is support for Unix Sockets, right?   What do I need to compile? Define __MonoCS__? I get this error:   mysqlclient\Shared

Re: [Mono-list] MySQL Connector/NET vs Mono

2005-09-08 Thread Bernhard Herzog
ROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel MorganSent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 12:08 PMTo: Mono-list@lists.ximian.comSubject: Re: [Mono-list] MySQL Connector/NET vs Mono If people are having problems running the MySQL Connector/NET on Mono, people could report these bugs to MySQ

RE: [Mono-list] MySQL Connector/NET vs Mono

2005-09-08 Thread Reggie Burnett
: [Mono-list] MySQL Connector/NET vs Mono If people are having problems running the MySQL Connector/NET on Mono, people could report these bugs to MySQL's bug database or wherever it is or a message to their public forum or mailing list to let them know.   However, I do be

Re: [Mono-list] MySQL Connector/NET vs Mono

2005-09-08 Thread Daniel Morgan
If people are having problems running the MySQL Connector/NET on Mono, people could report these bugs to MySQL's bug database or wherever it is or a message to their public forum or mailing list to let them know.   However, I do believe "we" should continue to maintain ByteFX.Data since it works w

Re: [Mono-list] MySQL Connector/NET vs Mono

2005-09-08 Thread Martin Hinks
Hi, I had lots of problems using the MySQL Connector under Mono and eventually reverted to using ByteFX - supported or not! However, If Joe's way works, then that is cool. On 9/8/05, Joe Audette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been using the MySQL Connector in mono for > quite a while with n

Re: [Mono-list] MySQL Connector/NET vs Mono

2005-09-08 Thread Joshua Tauberer
Brion Vibber wrote: However the current release of MySQL Connector/NET (1.0.5) appears to be Windows-specific; it attempts to make native calls into some ws2_32.dll and fails to work on Mono on eg Linux or Mac OS X. Last I looked, it's not supposed to use the win32-specific parts when running

Re: [Mono-list] MySQL Connector/NET vs Mono

2005-09-08 Thread Joe Audette
I have been using the MySQL Connector in mono for quite a while with no trouble at all in my project at http://www.mojoportal.com I compile it on Windows and deploy it to the bin folder of my web on linux and it works fine for me. I don't think I am using the very latest version of the Connector t

[Mono-list] MySQL Connector/NET vs Mono

2005-09-08 Thread Brion Vibber
The documentation at http://www.mono-project.com/MySQL strongly suggests that MySQL's Connector/NET should be used in preference to the ByteFX driver that ships with Mono. However the current release of MySQL Connector/NET (1.0.5) appears to be Windows-specific; it attempts to make native calls i