Re: [Mono-list] XML Serialization - difference between WinCLR and Mono runtime

2013-07-26 Thread MarLOne
Atsushi Eno-2 wrote Dave Curylo wrote: a class with non-public property setter. I believe sgen is the default GC in mono 3. GC sgen has nothing to do with XML serializer sgen tool. Parden my ignorance in Mono, is there more than one sgen program in Ubuntu Mono? Thanks. MarL --

Re: [Mono-list] XML Serialization - difference between WinCLR and Mono runtime

2013-07-26 Thread Jonathan Pryor
On Jul 25, 2013, at 9:20 PM, MarLOne infoseeker...@gmail.com wrote: Parden my ignorance in Mono, is there more than one sgen program in Ubuntu Mono? sgen has two different meanings: 1. SGen is Mono's Simple Generational GC, now the default in Mono 3.2. You can explicitly opt-in to using the

Re: [Mono-list] XML Serialization - difference between WinCLR and Mono runtime

2013-05-28 Thread MarLOne
Dave Curylo wrote As for the expected InvalidOperationException, I think this is one area that the mono maintainers seem to take liberty to deviate from MS .NET behavior. I've logged a few bugs like this in the past where mono does not throw an exception but MS does and they refuse to fix

Re: [Mono-list] XML Serialization - difference between WinCLR and Mono runtime

2013-05-25 Thread Atsushi Eno
Dave Curylo wrote: On Friday, May 17, 2013, MarLOne wrote: Sadly, the XmlSerializer failed the test in which it did not generate the InvalidOperationException and then same kind of complain that came from .Net's sgen when dealing with a class with non-public property

Re: [Mono-list] XML Serialization - difference between WinCLR and Mono runtime

2013-05-23 Thread Dave Curylo
On Friday, May 17, 2013, MarLOne wrote: Sadly, the XmlSerializer failed the test in which it did not generate the InvalidOperationException and then same kind of complain that came from .Net's sgen when dealing with a class with non-public property setter. Does mono use sgen? But at least it

Re: [Mono-list] XML Serialization - difference between WinCLR and Mono runtime

2013-05-20 Thread MarLOne
Hi Dave, Thanks for your suggestion and the links to download the parallel installation. It is fanatastic and why Linux does not do this as modi operandi for other software like GnuCash? I followed the instructions provided by the link and managed to install pmono and the accompanied MonoDevelop

Re: [Mono-list] XML Serialization - difference between WinCLR and Mono runtime

2013-05-14 Thread MarLOne
Daniel Lo Nigro wrote Have you tried this with Mono 3.0? No. I have not try this in Mono 3.0. I am not too experience in Ubuntu and I am rather being put off by the age-old-Unix-style of get-source-and-build. Hence I have not install Mono 3.0. It was already a struggle to get MonoDevelop 3.x on

Re: [Mono-list] XML Serialization - difference between WinCLR and Mono runtime

2013-05-14 Thread MarLOne
Hi, I rerun time test and write out the Environment.Version and it is 4.0.30319.1, which to me means .Net CLR 4.0. This therefore should not include any weird 'feature' Microsoft added to .Net Framework 2 SP2 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/956847 . Besides that knowledge base article

Re: [Mono-list] XML Serialization - difference between WinCLR and Mono runtime

2013-05-14 Thread Dave Curylo
On May 11, 2013, at 7:15 AM, MarLOne wrote: I am not too experience in Ubuntu and I am rather being put off by the age-old-Unix-style of get-source-and-build. Hence I have not install Mono 3.0. It was already a struggle to get MonoDevelop 3.x on to my Ubuntu 12.04. May be I have to look for

Re: [Mono-list] XML Serialization - difference between WinCLR and Mono runtime

2013-05-04 Thread Daniel Lo Nigro
Have you tried this with Mono 3.0? On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:08 PM, MarLOne infoseeker...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Not sure if this has been reported - there is difference in runtime treatment of XML Serialization between CLR and Mono runtime. I have a class like this: using System; using

[Mono-list] XML Serialization - difference between WinCLR and Mono runtime

2013-05-03 Thread MarLOne
Hi, Not sure if this has been reported - there is difference in runtime treatment of XML Serialization between CLR and Mono runtime. I have a class like this: using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; using System.Runtime.Serialization; namespace