Mihail Belanov wrote:
I don't fully understand the topic because of poor XML knowledge but why it
is not pointed the MS NET's XmlParser is *not SAX parser* while others are
(i.e. ISAXXMLReader interface in MSXML 4 or XMLReader class in JDK 1.4). It
works differently - namely, it is not event drive
quot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "mono-list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 7:31 AM
Subject: [Mono-list] XmlTextReader: MS compatibility, or W3C conformance?
> Hello,
>
> On bugzilla we (Ian and I) were discussing on XmlTextReader conformance
> to XML s
Hello,
> - as already suggested, we could enable a "mono power mode" as
> Ian described (first it should be the MS compatibility mode to
> ensure all applications from the MS.NET world are running fine).
Agreed. We can provide "MS.NET compatible mode" as one option.
> - Standards are important, but
be a small tool
which analyses the code for traps and suggests changes (maybe in a similar way as
Microsoft's migration assistants or FxCop do).
Regards
Jochen
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Juli 2004 15:28
An: Atsu
Atsushi Eno wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your point of view.
I could imagine that - if those bugs get reported to MS -
Microsoft will fix some of them in a next version of the .NET
framework. Till then, our highest priority should be to be 100%
compatible to the MS .NET framework behaviour and not to a
Hello,
Thanks for your point of view.
I could imagine that - if those bugs get reported to MS -
Microsoft will fix some of them in a next version of the .NET
framework. Till then, our highest priority should be to be 100%
compatible to the MS .NET framework behaviour and not to any
other standards.
TED] Im Auftrag von Atsushi Eno
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Juli 2004 05:32
An: mono-list
Betreff: [Mono-list] XmlTextReader: MS compatibility, or W3C conformance?
Hello,
On bugzilla we (Ian and I) were discussing on XmlTextReader conformance to XML
specification. MS XmlTextReader is buggy since it acc
Hello,
At the very least it should be added to a "Incompatibilities with
MS.net" document if such a beast exists. If it doesn't I think it would
be a useful addition to the docs/website.
Agreed. I think here we can mark it with [MonoFIX] attribute describing
what is the bug in MS.NET (MonoFIXAttr
Atsushi Eno wrote:
Ian MacLean wrote:
Atsushi Eno wrote:
Ian MacLean wrote:
Atsushi Eno wrote:
Hello,
On bugzilla we (Ian and I) were discussing on XmlTextReader
conformance
to XML specification. MS XmlTextReader is buggy since it accepts
XML declaration as element content (that violates W3C XML
Ian MacLean wrote:
Atsushi Eno wrote:
Ian MacLean wrote:
Atsushi Eno wrote:
Hello,
On bugzilla we (Ian and I) were discussing on XmlTextReader conformance
to XML specification. MS XmlTextReader is buggy since it accepts
XML declaration as element content (that violates W3C XML specification
section
Atsushi Eno wrote:
Ian MacLean wrote:
Atsushi Eno wrote:
Hello,
On bugzilla we (Ian and I) were discussing on XmlTextReader conformance
to XML specification. MS XmlTextReader is buggy since it accepts
XML declaration as element content (that violates W3C XML specification
section 3 Logical Structur
Ian MacLean wrote:
Atsushi Eno wrote:
Hello,
On bugzilla we (Ian and I) were discussing on XmlTextReader conformance
to XML specification. MS XmlTextReader is buggy since it accepts
XML declaration as element content (that violates W3C XML specification
section 3 Logical Structures).
http://bugzill
Atsushi Eno wrote:
Hello,
On bugzilla we (Ian and I) were discussing on XmlTextReader conformance
to XML specification. MS XmlTextReader is buggy since it accepts
XML declaration as element content (that violates W3C XML specification
section 3 Logical Structures).
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_b
Hello,
On bugzilla we (Ian and I) were discussing on XmlTextReader conformance
to XML specification. MS XmlTextReader is buggy since it accepts
XML declaration as element content (that violates W3C XML specification
section 3 Logical Structures).
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=61274
H
14 matches
Mail list logo
