[Mono-list] could linux be MORE .Net then windows ?

2006-03-27 Thread ted leslie
This article, with at least a bit of (hopefully accurate) research behind it, seems to state a shocking conclusion: article: http://www.grimes.demon.co.uk/dotnet/vistaAndDotnet.htm#conclusion My conclusion is that Microsoft has lost its confidence in .NET. They implement very little of their

Re: [Mono-list] could linux be MORE .Net then windows ?

2006-03-27 Thread Jonathan Pryor
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 04:28 -0500, ted leslie wrote: This article, with at least a bit of (hopefully accurate) research behind it, seems to state a shocking conclusion: article: http://www.grimes.demon.co.uk/dotnet/vistaAndDotnet.htm#conclusion And the rebuttal:

Re: [Mono-list] could linux be MORE .Net then windows ?

2006-03-27 Thread Kornél Pál
PROTECTED] Cc: mono-list@lists.ximian.com Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 1:08 PM Subject: Re: [Mono-list] could linux be MORE .Net then windows ? On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 04:28 -0500, ted leslie wrote: This article, with at least a bit of (hopefully accurate) research behind it, seems to state

Re: [Mono-list] could linux be MORE .Net then windows ?

2006-03-27 Thread ted leslie
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 06:08:17 -0500 Jonathan Pryor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 04:28 -0500, ted leslie wrote: This article, with at least a bit of (hopefully accurate) research behind it, seems to state a shocking conclusion: At which point we can realize that