Re: [Mono-list] mkbundle and cross compiling for ARM

2014-01-03 Thread mobin.seven
jacanosalado wrote I can't understand what is the real purpose of mkbundle. Would be great if anyone could make this clear. am I right if I say the unique purpose of mkbundle is to create a package containing all the assemblies a mono app depends on, but not to aot this package. AOT is a

Re: [Mono-list] mkbundle and cross compiling for ARM

2013-12-29 Thread jacanosalado
I can't understand what is the real purpose of mkbundle. Would be great if anyone could make this clear. am I right if I say the unique purpose of mkbundle is to create a package containing all the assemblies a mono app depends on, but not to aot this package. -- View this message in

Re: [Mono-list] mkbundle and cross compiling for ARM

2013-12-28 Thread Miguel de Icaza
In general, mkbundle serves two purposes: simplified deployment and light obfuscation. And it is both simpler and more robust to deploy with a relocatable Mono instead (the default) On Dec 1, 2013, at 4:03 AM, mobin.seven mobin.se...@live.com wrote: Hi markcoburnwa wrote I have

Re: [Mono-list] mkbundle and cross compiling for ARM

2013-12-06 Thread mobin.seven
markcoburnwa wrote I am now trying to instruct mkbundle to generate a native ARM executable which bundles the mono executable, my mono app, and the class libraries it references. I know mkbundle looks at the CC and AS environment variables so I set them beforehand to use the toolchain

Re: [Mono-list] mkbundle and cross compiling for ARM

2013-12-02 Thread mobin.seven
Hi markcoburnwa wrote I have successfully cross-compiled mono using my ARM toolchain. Can you tell me what did you wanted to do and how? Can you give me a link or teach me right here? I want to use mkbundle and port apps to ARM too. If you have succeed please give me a clue. Thanks --

Re: [Mono-list] mkbundle and cross compiling for ARM

2013-06-11 Thread markcoburnwa
Thanks, that is helpful to know about. However, according to the mkbundle.cs source file, it defaults to using the linux style and that style matches what is being generated when I run mkbundle. So it seems that mkbundle is not supported in my scenario. -- View this message in context:

Re: [Mono-list] mkbundle and cross compiling for ARM

2013-06-11 Thread Jonathan Pryor
On Jun 11, 2013, at 10:00 AM, markcoburnwa mcob...@globalscape.com wrote: Thanks, that is helpful to know about. However, according to the mkbundle.cs source file, it defaults to using the linux style and that style matches what is being generated when I run mkbundle. Indeed; I should have

[Mono-list] mkbundle and cross compiling for ARM

2013-06-10 Thread markcoburnwa
I am interested in using mkbundle (without the static option) to simplify deployment of a mono application to an ARM device. I have successfully cross-compiled mono using my ARM toolchain. I also compiled mono on the host machine without the cross compiler so I can compile my mono app using

Re: [Mono-list] mkbundle and cross compiling for ARM

2013-06-10 Thread Jonathan Pryor
On Jun 10, 2013, at 7:56 PM, markcoburnwa mcob...@globalscape.com wrote: Unfortunately, I get unrecognized symbol type assembler errors. The problem is that there is not just one style of assembly. There are multiple styles, for varying conventions, in order to appease the default assembler