i am looking for a parse generator for c#. i looked at jay but it is not
much to my liking - anybody used antlr w/ c# option? other options?
preferably of the open source variety. anybody working on writing /
port something that is self hosting in c#?
derek
_
Derek Gottfrid wrote:
i am looking for a parse generator for c#. i looked at jay but it is not
much to my liking - anybody used antlr w/ c# option? other options?
According to www.antlr.org, that unspeakable program also supports C#.
Coco/R is another tiny LL(k) parser generator which also sup
I just found another compiler-compiler: According to this ->
http://mailserver.di.unipi.it/pipermail/dotnet/msg00024.html,
an UK professor ported the tools from Appel's well known compiler
construction book from Java to C#. The zip mentioned on the page
contains a 700k textbook (unfortunately in
Hi,
Just a thought but I was wondering what folk thought of running a
nightly build for Mono. This would depend on resources but I am
impressed by the way Mozilla has nightly builds of its CVS tree so if
you are having problems accessing CVS, building source or you are
tracking a bug/change then
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stefan Matthias
> Aust
> Sent: 05 February 2003 08:21
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Mono-list] parse generator
>
>
> Derek Gottfrid wrote:
>
> > i
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Derek Gottfrid
> Sent: 05 February 2003 01:44
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Mono-list] parse generator
>
>
>
>
> i am looking for a parse generator for c#. i l
> Out of interest, why do you prefer LR(k) parsers over LL(k) parsers?
>
> Kunle
Yay! A question I can use my compiler class for!
To quote from the "Dragon" book ("Compilers: Principals, Techniques, and
Tools" by Aho, Sethi, Ullman, 1988), page 221:
There is a significant difference b
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stefan Matthias
> Aust
> Sent: 05 February 2003 08:21
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Mono-list] parse generator
>
>
> Derek Gottfrid wrote:
>
> > i
>
> > Out of interest, why do you prefer LR(k) parsers over LL(k) parsers?
> >
> > Kunle
>
> Yay! A question I can use my compiler class for!
>
> To quote from the "Dragon" book ("Compilers: Principals, Techniques, and
> Tools" by Aho, Sethi, Ullman, 1988), page 221:
>
> There is a signifi
> I understand the Dragon books point about LR grammars vs LL grammars. I made
> a reference to it in an earlier message.
Sorry. I had missed that reference.
> > To put it another way, an LR parser works by following the *reverse* of
> > a right-recursive derivation. This allows each input to
10 matches
Mail list logo
