Re: [Mono-list] server-sided concepts in Mono / ASP.NET vs. Java EE

2009-06-23 Thread Robert Jordan
Tobi Ulm wrote: > ... and > Windows Communication Foundation (WCF, .net 3.0, not implemented in mono, > look at mono Olive). You're looking in the wrong place. WCF is part of the mcs tree. Robert ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com ht

Re: [Mono-list] server-sided concepts in Mono / ASP.NET vs. Java EE

2009-06-22 Thread Tobi Ulm
Hi Kristian, the current mono release 2.4 is somewhere between .net 2.0 and .net 3.5, but it's not .net 3.0. - we use the ressource assemblies for that. - On the MS .net side there is the only "old" Application Server COM+ which is being replaced some days. Right now there are two ways on the

Re: [Mono-list] server-sided concepts in Mono / ASP.NET vs. Java EE

2009-06-22 Thread Kristian Rink
Tom Opgenorth schrieb: [un-deployment] > Ah, okay. Yes, .NET will handle the situation in a similar fashion, so > you should be okay. Okay then, thanks a bunch for your answers (and your patience... :) ). I'm on my way now, gonna see where it takes me. Thanks again and all the best, Kristian

Re: [Mono-list] server-sided concepts in Mono / ASP.NET vs. Java EE

2009-06-19 Thread Tom Opgenorth
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 01:51, Kristian Rink wrote: > In the Java EE environment, at the very least while dealing with EJB entity > or session beans, the undeployment / deployment mechanism ensures that, > whenever I have a "modified" version of my classes ready to be deployed to > the server, any

Re: [Mono-list] server-sided concepts in Mono / ASP.NET vs. Java EE

2009-06-19 Thread Kristian Rink
Hi again; and, once more, thanks everyone for your hints on that, much appreciated. :) Tom Opgenorth schrieb: [Deployment] > Not sure what you mean here? Do you mean you delete all the files > from your server? Or you copy new files over? In the Java EE environment, at the very least while d

Re: [Mono-list] server-sided concepts in Mono / ASP.NET vs. Java EE

2009-06-18 Thread Tom Opgenorth
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 05:06, Kristian Rink wrote: > [Deployment] > This seems pretty straightforward. However is there also a notion of > "undeploying" things again? Simply removing the code from the application > server? If so, what happens to classes that are loaded and have instances > hanging

Re: [Mono-list] server-sided concepts in Mono / ASP.NET vs. Java EE

2009-06-18 Thread Kristian Rink
Hi Tom; and first off, thanks a bunch for your comments which did shed some light on at least some of my questions... [Deployment] > To deploy a .NET web app one typically copies all the files over to > the web server. You could put everything into a ZIP file and just > unzip on your application

Re: [Mono-list] server-sided concepts in Mono / ASP.NET vs. Java EE

2009-06-17 Thread Tom Opgenorth
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 00:11, Kristian Rink wrote: > - In Java EE, I am sort of used to write code, pack both my compiled code > and additional resources (images, XML, whatever) into a .war or .jar file To deploy a .NET web app one typically copies all the files over to the web server. You could

[Mono-list] server-sided concepts in Mono / ASP.NET vs. Java EE

2009-06-16 Thread Kristian Rink
[resent as posting through gmame obviously doesn't work when not subscribed to the list as well] Folks; sorry if maybe this is a stupid question, nevertheless so far I don't know of any smarter way to answer this: Being a Java EE developer most of the time (and, for that matters, focused on the