First, usher has not been updated to exec 'mtn' by default rather than
'monotone'; this is not a big deal to work around (usher -m mtn), but
the default should probably be changed. A trivial patch is attached.
Second, with both the usher from 0.26-pre3 and the usher from 0.26 as
released, I am ha
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:48:49 -0400, Ethan
Blanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
eblanton> First, usher has not been updated to exec 'mtn' by default
eblanton> rather than 'monotone'; this is not a big deal to work
eblanton> around (usher -m mtn), but the default should
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker spake unto us the following wisdom:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:48:49 -0400, Ethan
> Blanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> eblanton> First, usher has not been updated to exec 'mtn' by default
> eblanton> rather than 'monotone'; this is not a
Hi,
I just rosterified a database. On inspecting the contents of the new
database I found out that all certificates had been reissued with my
own e-mail-adress. This would be an issue for a trust model based on
who handed out what certificate. Is there some way in which I can make
the certificate
Tom Koelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just rosterified a database. On inspecting the contents of the new
> database I found out that all certificates had been reissued with my
> own e-mail-adress. This would be an issue for a trust model based on
> who handed out what certificate.
Yes indee
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 17:25:56 +0200, Tom Koelman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
tkoelman> Another thing I noticed is that, understandably, all
tkoelman> revision hashes have changed. This has the unfortunate side
tkoelman> effect that propage Changelog entries make no sen
Hi Richard
I think you might have missed the point slightly...If I understand this correctly, he made the changelog in the past incorporating
reversion hashes which have now changed due to the 'rostification' of the databaseso the historical fact is that he HAS written
down specific hashes
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker schrieb:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:49:46 +0200, Henry Nestler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Henry.Ne> I'm use unchanged binary from
Henry.Ne> http://www.venge.net/monotone/downloads/mtn-0.26pre3-linux-x86.bz2
Henry.Ne>
Henry.Ne> Running:
H
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:36:44 +0100, Joel Crisp
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
jcrisp> I think you might have missed the point slightly...If I
jcrisp> understand this correctly, he made the changelog in the past
jcrisp> incorporating reversion hashes which have now change
Yeah, I was talking about the manually generated changelogs.
;-)
Joel
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:36:44 +0100, Joel Crisp
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
jcrisp> I think you might have missed the point slightly...If I
jcrisp> understan
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 23:43:26 +0200, Henry
Nestler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Henry.Ne> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker schrieb:
Henry.Ne> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:49:46 +0200,
Henry Nestler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Henry.Ne> >
Henry.Ne
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
Henry.Ne> + ./mtn-0.26-linux-x86 --debug --db=colinux-testing-run.db --norc
Henry.Ne> --rcfile=serv_anonymous.lua --bind=66.36.228.15:5 serve '*'
Henry.Ne> ...
Henry.Ne> mtn-0: network error: name resolution failure for 66.36.228.15: Bad
Henry.Ne> value
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 11 Apr 2006 00:29:25 +0200, Henry
Nestler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Henry.Ne> I'm ask again:
Henry.Ne> Why not ships the quasistatic (Moschny) as linux binary?
I have no idea what that is.
Cheers,
Richard
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free s
I'm noticing a disturbing lack of coder discipline, there's been a lot
of changes lately that doesn't heed the following line from HACKING:
All changes to the monotone source require an accompanying ChangeLog entry.
It may be that you feel it's unnecessary, since your entry is normally
simply c
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 11 Apr 2006 00:29:25 +0200, Henry Nestler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Henry.Ne> I'm ask again:
Henry.Ne> Why not ships the quasistatic (Moschny) as linux binary?
I have no idea what that is.
http://www.ipd.uni-karlsruh
Hello Richard,
All changes to the monotone source require an accompanying ChangeLog entry.
In this case I have a small question.
Often I need a merge after commit. My merge tool is xxdiff. I can only
give *my* Changelog or the *other* as merged. I'm would like not lose
from others and
I have a specialized ChangeLog merger at
https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/brownawe/www/merge.ChangeLog/
. It makes some assumptions (mostly, that entries are unique and don't
change very much), but seems to work ok.
Those of you getting this through monotone-devel may be interested in
merge.ChangeLog.m
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:09:11PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> The revs in the merge and propagate changelogs are really
> irrelevant, the ancestors of the merge/propagate are registered
> separately, and are always correct.
The direct ancestors being merged may be, but the cho
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 01:53:11AM +0200, Henry Nestler wrote:
> Often I need a merge after commit. My merge tool is xxdiff. I can only
> give *my* Changelog or the *other* as merged. I'm would like not lose
> from others and let falling down my Changes. Then I do a new commit for
> the Chan
On Sunday 09 April 2006 23:53, Derek Scherger wrote:
> Is anyone actually using inventory in its current form?
I use it to deduce what files have been moved and renamed in maildirs.
___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lis
20 matches
Mail list logo
