[Monotone-devel] interesting conversation on policy versioning

2006-04-18 Thread Nathaniel Smith
For people who don't follow IRC closely, some nice discussion tonight about the Last Big Feature: http://colabti.de/irclogger//irclogger_log/monotone?date=2006-04-18,Tue&sel=119#l194 http://venge.net/monotone/wiki/VersionedPolicy -- Nathaniel -- "But in Middle-earth, the distinct accusative

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Rosterify and certificate keys

2006-04-18 Thread Bruce Stephens
Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > I'd certainly accept patches to do things like output a mapping > between old and new ids (to do... whatever it is you wanted to do > with it, I guess?), or replacing rids in certs with the new name. Well, here's a patch that kind of does the f

[Monotone-devel] Re: About the maintainance of monotone

2006-04-18 Thread Shaun Jackman
On 4/17/06, Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > * The package built fine using debuild the first time, but the second > time was missing monotone.html. I don't know why. Very strange. > * monotone --version reports (base revision: unknown), which should be > fixed before uploading. Both

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: About the maintainance of monotone

2006-04-18 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:57:50 -0600, "Shaun Jackman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: sjackman> On 4/17/06, Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: sjackman> ... sjackman> > * The package built fine using debuild the first time, but sjackman> > the second time was missin

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: About the maintainance of monotone

2006-04-18 Thread Daniel Carosone
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 08:20:10PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > sjackman> package_full_revision_dist.txt > sjackman> package_full_revision.c > sjackman> package_revision.txt > sjackman> package_revision.c There were changes recently in how these were created and handled, especiall

[Monotone-devel] Monotone 0.26 universal binary on intel, HFS+

2006-04-18 Thread Brian Peyton
All tests behaved as expected. The problems in the test suite in the previous mail (to be approved by the moderator), were due to the test running on FAT32 instead of HFS+. ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.o