Hallo,
On 4/23/06, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> BTW, I just noticed that your commit time is 2006-04-23T15:58:57,
> which I'm guessing was your local time. However, monotone should
> store universal time (UTC), which would be 2006-04-23T18:58:57 in
> your case, I g
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 23 Apr 2006 15:59:49 -0300, "Alex
Queiroz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
asandroq> Hallo,
asandroq>
asandroq> On 4/23/06, Jeronimo Pellegrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
asandroq> > Hi.
asandroq> > I think I found a typo. :-)
asandroq> > See the patch.
asandroq>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 23 Apr 2006 15:59:49 -0300, "Alex
Queiroz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
asandroq> On 4/23/06, Jeronimo Pellegrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
asandroq> > Hi.
asandroq> > I think I found a typo. :-)
asandroq> > See the patch.
asandroq> > J.
asandroq>
asandroq>
Hallo,
On 4/23/06, Jeronimo Pellegrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
> I think I found a typo. :-)
> See the patch.
> J.
>
Fixed, thanks.
--
-alex
http://www.ventonegro.org/
___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lis
Hi.
I think I found a typo. :-)
See the patch.
J.
#
# old_revision [06a95cc590dbb2d40d06125e948fc4887cca2cbb]
#
# patch "lua.cc"
# from [428c82fdc531bd1129bb642c7423b666e93cf3dc]
#to [f383734fd155f9144eb978155db7da45660c5d40]
#
--
Hi,
there have been numerous times when I've pulled and wanted to know
what branches were affected, if it's worth it to try an updated or
not. The new note_netsync_* Lua hooks provide exactly the kind of
framework to make it easy, so I did.
A somewhat typical (as typical as Swedish is for you :-
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 11:11:29AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:46:53PM -0700, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> > > Thanks! Would you be interested in adapting this to go in the manual?
> >
> > I hope it's OK to attach it here. I didn't know wha
Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:46:53PM -0700, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> > Thanks! Would you be interested in adapting this to go in the manual?
>
> I hope it's OK to attach it here. I didn't know what section of the
> manual it should go into, so I just formatted it as tex
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:46:53PM -0700, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Thanks! Would you be interested in adapting this to go in the manual?
I hope it's OK to attach it here. I didn't know what section of the
manual it should go into, so I just formatted it as texinfo. I don't
know what to do about v
