Does it make sense to anyone that 'mtn ls unknown' lists the entire tree
below an unknown directory?
I keep a very small part of my home directories in monotone and mtn ls
unknown takes a very long time to run, and produces volumes of output,
mainly because it's listing everything in and below
or is it "hear hear" ? ;-)
RS
On 11/25/06, Rob Schoening <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here here.
RS
On 11/25/06, Ulf Ochsenfahrt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This line ending thing is getting far too much attention, IMHO. My last
> word on this issue is:
>
> - Whatever I check
Here here.
RS
On 11/25/06, Ulf Ochsenfahrt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
This line ending thing is getting far too much attention, IMHO. My last
word on this issue is:
- Whatever I check in, I want checked out
- What I'd like to see is a setting where monotone checks on commit if
the
There's a pretty serious bug in automate stdio in mtn 0.31 and mainline.
Under certain circumstances, mtn gets confused reading its input and
processes a command that is different from what was sent on stdin.
I believe the attached (one-line) patch fixes this. Unfortunately, I
see no easy wa
Markus Schiltknecht schrieb:
Absolutely! We also have to agree on a date.
Although, if I can get a plane ticket for less than EUR 500, I'm tempted
to join the US meeting and check out the place where all my nice search
results come from ;-)
As I already stated sometime in mid-february would
Hi,
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Note that I dunno what the folks talking about meeting in Germany are
planning to do; ask them :-). (One option is to schedule that to
coincide with the second half of the .us meeting, though, so it's
still probably useful to put your letters on the wiki even if you a
Hi all,
This line ending thing is getting far too much attention, IMHO. My last
word on this issue is:
- Whatever I check in, I want checked out
- What I'd like to see is a setting where monotone checks on commit if
the files obey a particular line ending convention/charset and gives a
warn
Larry Hastings wrote:
Ulf Ochsenfahrt wrote:
Yes, but UTF-8 is a _multi-byte_ encoding.
If you see an LF byte, you don't know whether this is a single-byte LF
or part of a multi-byte sequence.
Yes you do, because all multi-byte character sequences in UTF-8 have the
high-bit set. If you see 0