On 25/01/2007, at 18:55, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu,
25 Jan 2007 17:49:53 +0100, Julio M. Merino Vidal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
jmmv84 For some reason, monotone is adding an unnamed directory to my
jmmv84 changeset. I have hit this several
What happens if a user who has only read-permission for branch A writes
something to branch B? As far as I see this is possible as
write-permissions are per database and not per branch. If branch B is only
for privileged users is it still protected? I'd say so as the new user
can't link
Nathaniel J. Smith schrieb:
If it's useful for development, why not stick it in contrib/ so
everyone can easily find it? :-)
Would be a possibility, of course, but I'd rather like to integrate it
somewhere on venge.net and polish it a bit for web output. If it is good
enough, it can go to
If I do
mtn pluck -r abcdef...
and afterwards
mtn commit --message=My message
it will fail because mtn pluck has written the file _MTN/log
with content similar to:
applied changes from 1234...
through abcd...
Now I have two minor usability points:
1 - I was
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:55:36 +0100, Julio M.
Merino Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
jmmv84 On 25/01/2007, at 18:55, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
jmmv84
jmmv84 This is by design, and only happens with the initial add to a new
jmmv84 project. That unnamed
Hi all!
Another nice little script from me, this time it deals with updating a
website (or any other resource) as soon as revisions or certs for a
particular branch, on which the resource is based, arrive.
All you need then is a running mtn server process on the same server and
everything should
Hugo Cornelis schrieb:
Mmmh, let me see if I understand this:
So the script 'listens' to a particular branch, and on commit, pushes
the branch to a remote repository or updates a different workspace ?
It updates a different workspace.
Just questions: can you call monotone do to a checkout
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 08:16:56AM -0800, J Decker wrote:
I cleaned up this branch quite some time ago. After upgrading the database,
it's complaining that files that were removed are missing.
What further information can I give?
You upgraded from what to what? What upgrade commands did you
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 11:09:47AM +0100, Thomas Keller wrote:
Hi all!
I just wrote a little python script which shows me the translation
status for monotone. For this purpose it queries the files directly via
mtn cat and feeds them into msgfmt -cv.
I initially thought this would be a
...Did this ever get applied?
(If you'd like to continue hacking on monotone.el, send me a key and
you can commit your changes yourself...)
-- Nathaniel
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 03:14:11PM -0800, Steven E. Harris wrote:
Steven E. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I adjusted the handling of
I just did something similar the other night. Mine is much simpler
though. It uses the netsync hooks on the server to run a script if
there were revisions in (I don't care about branches in this case as
we only ever have one for this particular project)...the script does a
merge update. It
Zack Weinberg wrote:
Does anyone have (good) reasons not to do this? I think it'd help us
keep the code clean.
I tried to do this once before. I found some real, if probably
harmless, bugs doing it (things being converted to types they honestly
weren't) and I think it's a great idea, but I
Boris wrote:
What happens if a user who has only read-permission for branch A writes
something to branch B? As far as I see this is possible as
write-permissions are per database and not per branch. If branch B is
only for privileged users is it still protected? I'd say so as the new
user
Graydon Hoare [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I believe at the moment that any database set up to reject the user
writing to branch B will reject certificates from that user that bind
a revision to B, and possibly reject the revision as well.
I think write permissions are just per-user, so
On 1/26/07, Graydon Hoare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zack Weinberg wrote:
I tried to [make vocab-from-string constructors explicit] once
before. I found some real, if probably harmless, bugs doing it
(things being converted to types they honestly weren't) and I
think it's a great idea, but I
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 00:25:59 +0200, Bruce Stephens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graydon Hoare [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I believe at the moment that any database set up to reject the user
writing to branch B will reject certificates from that user that bind
a revision to B, and possibly
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:16:37 +0200, Graydon Hoare [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Boris wrote:
What happens if a user who has only read-permission for branch A writes
something to branch B? As far as I see this is possible as
write-permissions are per database and not per branch. If branch B is
I think the project_t work that is being done currently might make
this a little more sane. Personally, I've shied away from mixing
multiple projects in one db in favour of a ~/monotone directory
containing one .mtn db per project. It just felt cleaner to me.
YMMV.
-Ben
On 1/26/07, Boris
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 02:02:48PM +0100, Thomas Keller wrote:
Nathaniel J. Smith schrieb:
If it's useful for development, why not stick it in contrib/ so
everyone can easily find it? :-)
Would be a possibility, of course, but I'd rather like to integrate it
somewhere on venge.net and
No, sorry, it was actually a WIP...
On 1/25/07, Nathaniel J. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 08:16:56AM -0800, J Decker wrote:
I cleaned up this branch quite some time ago. After upgrading the
database,
it's complaining that files that were removed are missing.
What
20 matches
Mail list logo
