I've seen talk about adapting ikiwiki to monotone. Is there some code
somewhere I could look at and test?
Cheers,
Richard
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hello,
I'm use Monotone for colinux and would sync the source tree to
sourceforge, to use the compile farm.
What is an usable plan for this?
Convert Monotone to Subversion with Tailor and than sync with Subversion?
I followed the other thread "Monotone CVS sync"
http://article.gmane.org/gma
Hi,
William Uther wrote:
I've just finished a patch to make --execute the default.
Cool.
Actually,
it entirely removes the --execute option, and adds a new option
--bookkeep-only which is approximately the inverse of -e. This also
adds some checks to the drop implementation so that if y
Hi,
Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
Do we want to call that argument '--bookkeep-only'? That seems ugly to
me. And I don't recall naming what monotone does 'bookkeeping', anywhere
else.
As usual, I've just stumbled across the following error message:
mtn: warning: ignored bookkeeping path '_MTN'
Paul Crowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Monotone has a flag day coming up in any case, because of the move
> away from SHA-1.
To what are you/we moving?
--
Steven E. Harris
___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.n
Steven E. Harris wrote:
Monotone has a flag day coming up in any case, because of the move
away from SHA-1.
To what are you/we moving?
SHA-256, I think, until NIST name its successor in about five years. See:
http://venge.net/mtn-wiki/FutureCryptography
--
__
\/ o\ Paul Crowley, [EMAIL PR
On 2/26/07, Steven E. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paul Crowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Monotone has a flag day coming up in any case, because of the move
> away from SHA-1.
To what are you/we moving?
I'll summarize what I remember from the summit about our security/encryption.
1
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 01:17:24PM -0800, Justin Patrin wrote:
> 3) DSA can only sign less than 256 bits (140?) so moving to SHA-256
> and DSA will be problematic.
DSA, algorithmically, can sign arbitrary size hashes, as long as you
choose a large enough q parameter. Until recently the standardize
Hi all,
Monotone does not seem to deal with extant but unreferenced rosters
which are regenerated by a new commit gracefully. Viz:
mtn -d test.mtn db init
mkdir test
cd test
echo "Test to crash monotone" > test.txt
mtn -d ../test.mtn setup -b org.example.monotone.test
mtn add test.txt
mtn ci -m
On 2/26/07, Jack Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 01:17:24PM -0800, Justin Patrin wrote:
> 3) DSA can only sign less than 256 bits (140?) so moving to SHA-256
> and DSA will be problematic.
DSA, algorithmically, can sign arbitrary size hashes, as long as you
choose a larg
On 26/02/2007, at 9:51 PM, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
Actually, it entirely removes the --execute option, and adds a new
option --bookkeep-only which is approximately the inverse of -e.
This also adds some checks to the drop implementation so that if
you try to drop a changed file (or a d
On 26/02/2007, at 6:54 PM, Paul Crowley wrote:
Monotone has a flag day coming up in any case, because of the move
away from SHA-1. Graydon (rightly) wants to change the certificate
format; since that's also a flag day event that should probably be
done on the same day. We should move tow
Jack Lloyd wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 01:17:24PM -0800, Justin Patrin wrote:
3) DSA can only sign less than 256 bits (140?) so moving to SHA-256
and DSA will be problematic.
DSA, algorithmically, can sign arbitrary size hashes, as long as you
choose a large enough q parameter. Until recent
William Uther wrote:
I've got some netsync changes I'd like to make:
- treat unkown keys as anonymous connections
- auto fallback from 'sync' to just 'pull' if that's all you have
perms for
Is this the sort of thing to go in the flag day too? Or is a netsync
change much less of an issue?
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 09:36 +1100, William Uther wrote:
> On 26/02/2007, at 6:54 PM, Paul Crowley wrote:
>
> > Monotone has a flag day coming up in any case, because of the move
> > away from SHA-1. Graydon (rightly) wants to change the certificate
> > format; since that's also a flag day eve
> "Richard" == Richard Levitte <- VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> writes:
Richard> I've seen talk about adapting ikiwiki to monotone. Is
Richard> there some code somewhere I could look at and test?
No. I started at one point, but got bogged down in the details.
Securely running an
> "Paul" == Paul Crowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> The question is how attached we are to ssh-agent. It's very
Paul> cool but it's limiting in this regard. If we want to go
Paul> with it, it's a question of whether we can persuade it to
Paul> accept 256-bit q.
I came
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:57:48AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> No. I started at one point, but got bogged down in the details.
>
> Securely running an external command in Perl without invoking the
> shell and grabbing the commands STDOUT is not easy...
>
> Probably the best way would be to create a
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:57:48AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > "Richard" == Richard Levitte <- VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> writes:
>
> Richard> I've seen talk about adapting ikiwiki to monotone. Is
> Richard> there some code somewhere I could look at and test?
>
> No. I started
On 26/02/2007, at 9:51 PM, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
Why don't you simply get a monotone key? Send the public key to
Nathaniel, he will happily give you push access to venge.net...
I did. He did.
Scary.
I just pushed n.v.m.default-execute with the version of monotone that
executes by d
net.venge.monotone.ssh-agent is ready to be merged to mainline I
think. It has one strange test failure in the first set of tests which
I haven't been able to track down. If someone could help me track that
down I'd be grateful.
key...
unknown location(0): fatal error in "signature_round_trip":
s
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:57:48 +1100, Brian May
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
bam> > "Richard" == Richard Levitte <- VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
writes:
bam>
bam> Richard> I've seen talk about adapting ikiwiki to monotone. Is
bam> Richard> there some c
Hi,
William Uther wrote:
mtn drop ${STH}:
- file ${STH} exists
File exists and is under version control and is unchanged:
deleted with message about dropping from manifest (as currently -
maybe should change?)
No, that's fine, IMO.
File exists and is under version control and is change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Crowley wrote:
> SHA-256, I think, until NIST name its successor in about five years. See:
> http://venge.net/mtn-wiki/FutureCryptography
I could be nice if the policy could define one (or more!) "hash change
horizon" before of which the less se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Crowley wrote:
> Jack Lloyd wrote:
>> DSA, algorithmically, can sign arbitrary size hashes, as long as you
>> choose a large enough q parameter. Until recently the standardized max
>> for q was 160 bits, FIPS 186-3 (currently in draft) allows long
On 2/26/07, William Uther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mtn drop ${STH}:
> - file ${STH} exists
File exists and is under version control and is unchanged:
deleted with message about dropping from manifest (as currently -
maybe should change?)
File exists and is under version control and is c
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 08:14:27PM -0800, Justin Patrin wrote:
> net.venge.monotone.ssh-agent is ready to be merged to mainline I
> think. It has one strange test failure in the first set of tests which
> I haven't been able to track down. If someone could help me track that
> down I'd be grateful.
27 matches
Mail list logo
