Derek Scherger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The sub-command style of things seems like something we should
> explore further and I think branches should be able to fit into this
> well enough. i.e.
Yes, yes, yes!!! Thank you! I couldn't figure out what was bothering
me about the monotone comman
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> That said, I'm not stuck on branch --go; but we do need some solution
> to these problems.
This feels like an yet another new style of commands to me and I think
we already have too many.
We currently have:
-- Single word commands that take options and arguments, which a
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 11:27:21PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 7 Mar 2007 23:19:39 +0100, "Olivier
> Andrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> oandrieu> Err, are you sure this is bash syntax ? Mine does choke on
> oandrieu> these regexp-lookin
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:26:55PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 6 Mar 2007 22:12:01 -0800, Nathaniel
> Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> njs> 'mtn branch --go':
> njs>same as 'mtn update -b -r h:
>
> And soon, we will become tla, th
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 7 Mar 2007 23:19:39 +0100, "Olivier
Andrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
oandrieu> Err, are you sure this is bash syntax ? Mine does choke on
oandrieu> these regexp-looking constructs in the "case".
Works on my laptop. Could this be about bash version? Mine
On 2/22/07, Matthew Sackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 09:07:48PM -0800, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 10:59:51PM +, Matthew Sackman wrote:
> > These are really minor improvements which add branch selectors: i.e. I
> > often do mtn update -r h:s
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 6 Mar 2007 22:12:01 -0800, Nathaniel
Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
njs> 'mtn branch --go':
njs>same as 'mtn update -b -r h:
And soon, we will become tla, the VCS where there are at least 3 ways
to do anything, almost but not entirely alike...
I cal
I think this is a good use-case to be documented on the wiki, with the
appropriate remediation steps to take. Should this involve the trust
hooks at all?
--
Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.wookimus.net/
assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 06 Mar 2007 09:58:02 +0100, Thomas
Keller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
me> Nathaniel Smith schrieb:
me> > In particular:
me> > -- Is anyone up to being backup administrator (in case I get
me> > eaten by a grue)?
me>
me> I could do that, but I guess Rich
On 07/03/2007, at 3:04 PM, William Uther wrote:
A developer here was working at a remote site. He took a copy of
the db but not a copy of his key. He generated himself a new key
(using the same key id as his normal key), and committed using it. He
got some error (now lost in the mists of ti
On 08/03/2007, at 7:19 AM, Graydon Hoare wrote:
William Uther wrote:
mtn: warning: ignoring bad signature by
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]:YXUuY29tLm5pY3RhLmR
nYw==]' I was hoping that the bad rev would eventually be ignored
once
evveryone moved past it, but I just checked ou
William Uther wrote:
mtn: warning: ignoring bad signature by
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]:YXUuY29tLm5pY3RhLmRnYw==]'
I was hoping that the bad rev would eventually be ignored once
evveryone moved past it, but I just checked out a new workspace, and
it gave that warning too. Is
Jon Bright wrote:
Hi,
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
That's a very good question -- we have a few associated projects
(at least guitone, mtteam, perhaps botan/ajisai if we are serious
about switching to SSL) that might have good sized projects for SoC,
and could benefit from the help.
I'd be happy t
13 matches
Mail list logo
