Derek Scherger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stephen Leake wrote:
>> I haven't heard any objections to this; a couple people said they
>> would review the docs and such.
>>
>> So if I have not heard any objections by this weekend (Sept 15), I'll
>> merge nvm.basic_io.inventory to nvm then.
>>
>>
Stephen Leake wrote:
> I haven't heard any objections to this; a couple people said they
> would review the docs and such.
>
> So if I have not heard any objections by this weekend (Sept 15), I'll
> merge nvm.basic_io.inventory to nvm then.
>
> Ok?
I haven't had a chance to read the docs on the
I've written a quick patch (attached) to implement using Putty's
ssh-agent (Pageant) on win32.
It works just fine for me; any suggestions or complaints are, of
course, welcome.
Thanks.
-Daniel
win32_pageant_ssh-agent.diff
Description: Binary data
___
On 11/09/2007, at 9:12 PM, Stephen Leake wrote:
Richard Levitte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:22:43 +0200, "Julio M. Merino Vidal"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
jmmv84> Using plain text messages will make one think twice before
jmmv84> doi
On 9/11/07, Richard Levitte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're talking about two different kinds of documentations. When I
> update my workspace, or even better, when I'm about to, and I want to
> know what will happen, the most natural is to check out the log. If
> all the log says is that this
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:57:34AM -0500, Hugo Cornelis wrote:
> On 9/11/07, Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I propose that "set of revisions" ~ "branch"? It would definitely be
> > nice to have more branch metadata.
> >
>
> Yes, there is a relationship between them, I am not sure
On 9/11/07, Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:00:49AM -0500, Hugo Cornelis wrote:
> > Using certs, it is possible to link sets of revisions to an entry in
> > an external log file. Then each entry in the external log file can
> > contain a global description o
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:00:49AM -0500, Hugo Cornelis wrote:
> Using certs, it is possible to link sets of revisions to an entry in
> an external log file. Then each entry in the external log file can
> contain a global description of what happened for this set of
> revisions.
>
> That way, and
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:19:33 +0200, "Ralf S.
Engelschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rse+monotone-devel> Sure, that's what I'm doing, Richard.
I probably have to go back and read the original mail again... bbl.
Cheers,
Richard
-
Please consider sponsoring my
On 9/11/07, Richard Levitte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're talking about two different kinds of documentations. When I
> update my workspace, or even better, when I'm about to, and I want to
> know what will happen, the most natural is to check out the log. If
> all the log says is that this
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007, Richard Levitte wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:26:47 +0200, "Ralf S.
> Engelschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> rse+monotone-devel> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007, Richard Levitte wrote:
> rse+monotone-devel>
> rse+monotone-devel> > In message <[EMAIL
Thanks for this Ralf. I'll look at it shortly. I realize that I
relied on the daemon call...I'm not sure as to the portability of this
call, but it is common to Linux systems and (as cygwin relies heavily
on linux libs/tools/etc) cygwin [I haven't built against cygwin though
and don't know the de
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:26:47 +0200, "Ralf S.
Engelschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rse+monotone-devel> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007, Richard Levitte wrote:
rse+monotone-devel>
rse+monotone-devel> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 11 Sep 2007
13:32:27 +0200, "Ralf
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007, Richard Levitte wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:32:27 +0200, "Ralf S.
> Engelschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> rse+monotone-devel> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> rse+monotone-devel> > 5. Load "example.rsa.ppk" in PuTTY's
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:32:27 +0200, "Ralf S.
Engelschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rse+monotone-devel> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
rse+monotone-devel> > 5. Load "example.rsa.ppk" in PuTTY's Pageant -- Voila!
rse+monotone-devel>
rse+monotone-de
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 11 Sep 2007 07:12:54 -0400, Stephen
Leake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
stephen_leake> On the other hand, that is the way we typically work. I
stephen_leake> often notice "little things" while I'm working on one
stephen_leake> "big thing". Would it be better to
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 01:48:52PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> But is _THIS_ really the intention behind the "mtn approve"?
> Interesting, I've always wondered what this command is about and
> especially why it is named "approve". Well, even if it is just for
> creating branches I'm still t
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> Thomas Keller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ralf S. Engelschall schrieb:
> >> The only possibility I've found is to manually issue an additional cert
> >> for the new branch via:
> >>
> >> $ mtn cert h:foo.bar.cvs branch foo.bar
> >>
> >> This work
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007, Ben Walton wrote:
> I just synced a branch called nvm.daemon-support. All tests are
> passing on my tree, but I've only got Ubuntu Feisty to test on right
> now. I hope that someone can build/test it on more platforms (windows
> would be especially helpful).
>
> Let me know
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> As it isn't obvious how to drive Monotone on a Unix server with an RSA
> private key loaded into Pageant (PuTTY's ssh-agent(1) variant) on a
> Windows desktop, here are the required steps -- just for information and
> for the record:
>
> 1. Genera
As it isn't obvious how to drive Monotone on a Unix server with an RSA
private key loaded into Pageant (PuTTY's ssh-agent(1) variant) on a
Windows desktop, here are the required steps -- just for information and
for the record:
1. Generate the Monotone RSA private/public key pair
$ mtn genkey
On Sep 11, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Stephen Leake wrote:
Richard Levitte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:22:43 +0200, "Julio M. Merino Vidal"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
jmmv84> Using plain text messages will make one think twice before
jmmv84> doi
Richard Levitte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:31:59 -0400, Stephen
> Leake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> stephen_leake> I was waiting for the 0.36 release to be done to raise
> stephen_leake> this issue again, and then I was waiting for time t
Richard Levitte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:22:43 +0200, "Julio M.
> Merino Vidal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> jmmv84> Using plain text messages will make one think twice before
> jmmv84> doing that, because he'll have to explain *why* he
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:22:43 +0200, "Julio M.
Merino Vidal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
jmmv84> Using plain text messages will make one think twice before
jmmv84> doing that, because he'll have to explain *why* he is
jmmv84> committing that at once.
I totally agree w
On Sep 11, 2007, at 2:18 AM, William Uther wrote:
On 10/09/2007, at 7:49 PM, Thomas Keller wrote:
Hi all!
I've noticed that the changelog some people use for monotone is not
quite "GNU-style". I'm sure you all hacked stuff longer than me,
so you
can correct me at any time, but aren't we
26 matches
Mail list logo
