Re: [Monotone-devel] speed of "mtn ls branches"

2008-01-16 Thread Tony Tung
On Jan 16, 2008, at 8:17 PM, William Uther wrote: On 17/01/2008, at 2:35 PM, Tony Tung wrote: Hi, I just downloaded monotone 0.38, and I found the command "mtn ls branches" to take a lot longer than the previous version I was using (0.35). Since I kept the old binary around, I did some

Re: [Monotone-devel] speed of "mtn ls branches"

2008-01-16 Thread William Uther
On 17/01/2008, at 4:00 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote: On Jan 16, 2008 11:17 PM, William Uther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 17/01/2008, at 2:35 PM, Tony Tung wrote: I just downloaded monotone 0.38, and I found the command "mtn ls branches" to take a lot longer than the previous version I was using

Re: [Monotone-devel] speed of "mtn ls branches"

2008-01-16 Thread Zack Weinberg
On Jan 16, 2008 11:17 PM, William Uther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 17/01/2008, at 2:35 PM, Tony Tung wrote: > > I just downloaded monotone 0.38, and I found the command "mtn ls > > branches" to take a lot longer than the previous version I was > > using (0.35). > > That is almost certainly due

Re: [Monotone-devel] speed of "mtn ls branches"

2008-01-16 Thread William Uther
On 17/01/2008, at 2:35 PM, Tony Tung wrote: Hi, I just downloaded monotone 0.38, and I found the command "mtn ls branches" to take a lot longer than the previous version I was using (0.35). Since I kept the old binary around, I did some timing with the two binaries, same database. 0.3

[Monotone-devel] speed of "mtn ls branches"

2008-01-16 Thread Tony Tung
Hi, I just downloaded monotone 0.38, and I found the command "mtn ls branches" to take a lot longer than the previous version I was using (0.35). Since I kept the old binary around, I did some timing with the two binaries, same database. 0.35 takes 0.023s to complete the operation while

Re: [Monotone-devel] options for automate inventory

2008-01-16 Thread Thomas Keller
Thomas Keller schrieb: Thomas Moschny schrieb: actually does what it should (in all cases the "wrong" option is just skipped). Really? Here, it does work: $ echo 'l8:branchese' | mtn automate stdio | wc -l 102 $ echo 'o20:ignore-suspend-certs0:el8:branchese' | mtn automate stdio | wc -l 2

Re: [Monotone-devel] Perhaps strange request: partial per-file commit

2008-01-16 Thread Ulf Ochsenfahrt
Derek Scherger wrote: The idea I had in mind would be something like, commit the current revision to your local db *without* a branch cert, but perhaps with some other paused cert that gives a name to each paused revision. This commit would be done by the pause command. After committing the pau

Re: [Monotone-devel] ViewMTN 0.08

2008-01-16 Thread Grahame Bowland
On 14/01/2008, William Uther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, >I just noticed that http://viewmtn.angrygoats.net/ is not taking > notice of suspend certs. That probably speeds things up a little, > but I was wondering if you'd done any recent tests (there were some > speed improvements that we

[Monotone-devel] [ANN] guitone-0.7 released

2008-01-16 Thread Thomas Keller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all! guitone 0.7 has just been released today. Most of the changes over the past 9+ months since the latest major version are under the hood, so there are only a few "new" things you can actually see (most notably the file history browser, a new i

Fwd: [Monotone-devel] Perhaps strange request: partial per-file commit

2008-01-16 Thread Zbigniew Zagórski
[ William, for double post Why this list doesn't set Reply-to header ? ] 2008/1/16, William Uther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I like this 'commitdiff' concept. It is a simple command that could be +1 for commitdiff from here. It's very good idea. > The only real question is how this affect items tha