On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Matthew Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zack Weinberg wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Stephen Leake
>>
>> p.s.: legendarily, there *is* an undocumented Win32 system call
>> equivalent to fork(); anyone who wants to find that and use it instead
>
Zack Weinberg wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Stephen Leake
p.s.: legendarily, there *is* an undocumented Win32 system call
equivalent to fork(); anyone who wants to find that and use it instead
of this rather rube-goldberg mechanism will probably be rewarded with
a faster test suite.
Stephen Leake wrote:
Matthew Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Zack Weinberg wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Markus Wanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* lua: pretty similar to sqlite, except the source inclusion variant is
a bit more complicated. I'm all for dynamic linking and d
Markus Wanner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thank you for your review.
>
> Stephen Leake wrote:
>> So I think keeping date unsigned is ok, but please document this
>> rationale in dates.hh.
>
> Okay, will do.
>
> One reason for using unsigned is that a single $DATE < $MAX is
> sufficient in valid(), whereas
As part of implementing the resolve_conflicts commands, I'd like to
change the behavior of --message and --message-file for propagate and
merge.
I'd like mtn to insert the current message:
propagate from branch 'testbranch2' (head
c606ed519e48f526bb130fd64fef712f795f0625)
to branch
