On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> net.venge.monotone.error-handling is meant to clean up our E(), I(), N()
> usage somewhat, so that for example receiving an invalid revision from
> the network will be treated differently than internally generating an
> invalid revision
On Sat, 2009-01-17 at 18:04 +, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> net.venge.monotone.error-handling is meant to clean up our E(), I(), N()
> usage somewhat, so that for example receiving an invalid revision from
> the network will be treated differently than internally generating an
> invalid revision
Sorry... missed the reply all button...
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Markus Wanner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Derek Scherger wrote:
> > I have run timings on a few different things, the testsuite, db check and
> > full pulls
>
> These all don't represent use cases I'm eagerly awaiting optimization
> f
Hi,
I've just run through the testsuite with mtn compiled against an up to
date sqlite 3.6.10 (released Jan 15th). All tests succeed.
> monotone 0.43dev (base revision: 2d8426478d56750e764a5ce552ba3ce7c22acb0a)
> Running on : Linux 2.6.26-1-686 #1 SMP Thu Jan 1 02:26:25 UTC 2009
> i686
Markus Wanner writes:
> Hi,
>
> Stephen Leake wrote:
>> I have a patch for m4/pcre.m4 that fixes a similar problem on Win32
>> (it will show up on any system that doesn't have pkg-config).
>> ac_link uses CPPFLAGS, _not_ CFLAGS. try specifying CPPFLAGS on the
>> configure command line.
>
> Oh, ye
Hi,
Stephen Leake wrote:
> I have a patch for m4/pcre.m4 that fixes a similar problem on Win32
> (it will show up on any system that doesn't have pkg-config).
> ac_link uses CPPFLAGS, _not_ CFLAGS. try specifying CPPFLAGS on the
> configure command line.
Oh, yeah, thanks for that hint. Specifying
Philipp Gröschler wrote:
> Anonymous write access?
Uh, nope, you should send your key to Richard in order to be able to
push revisions.
> If noone objects then I could test the TechinfoML -> Wiki converter this
> way. As long as these parts don't get linked from somewhere, nobody
> should find th
Lapo Luchini schrieb:
> Just pull the branch net.venge.monotone.web and edit files under /wiki/,
> when you push the changes to monotone.ca, the wiki will automatically
> update.
Anonymous write access?
If noone objects then I could test the TechinfoML -> Wiki converter this
way. As long as these
In message on Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:44:05 +0100,
Lapo Luchini said:
lapo> Philipp Gröschler wrote:
lapo> > Therefore, two (possibly stupid) questions:
lapo> > - Is there some kind of search function in the new wiki?
lapo>
lapo> Not yet, though one can be installed via CGI, AFAIK.
Thanks for the
Hi,
Thomas Moschny wrote:
> Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> I'd prefer not to drop the minimum version below the most recent point
>> at which an exploitable crasher bug was fixed, which (according to
>> pcre's NEWS file) was 7.6. There probably isn't an attack vector with
>> our usage but I can't prove
Philipp Gröschler wrote:
> Therefore, two (possibly stupid) questions:
> - Is there some kind of search function in the new wiki?
Not yet, though one can be installed via CGI, AFAIK.
> - How do I make changes? I already guessed that the wiki files are
> edited directly and then checked in, so, ho
Hi,
Thomas Moschny wrote:
> A Fedora botan package is on the way, see
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528.
Also very nice, thank you.
Markus
___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/l
Hi,
Thomas Keller wrote:
> A small note here: There is a botan package in MP, but it is currently
> unusable since botan-config --libs behaves wrongly. I've created a
> ticket for that [0] and hope that it is resolved until we release 0.43.
As a work-around, you can provide BOTAN_LIBS and BOTAN_C
Hi,
Stephen Leake wrote:
> I believe I compiled against 1.7.8-3, since that's what is in my
> Debian distribution. I guess I should redo that and check with ldd?
Yeah, ldd certainly tells for sure.
Another very interesting output would be that of 'mtn version --full'.
Regards
Markus Wanner
Hi,
Derek Scherger wrote:
> I have run timings on a few different things, the testsuite, db check and
> full pulls
These all don't represent use cases I'm eagerly awaiting optimization
for. I don't mind if db check or an initial pull takes a while.
I'm much more interested in optimizations for l
Zack Weinberg wrote:
> I'd prefer not to drop the minimum version below the most recent point
> at which an exploitable crasher bug was fixed, which (according to
> pcre's NEWS file) was 7.6. There probably isn't an attack vector with
> our usage but I can't prove it so I'd rather be safe.
>
> (C
Hi,
thanks for your efforts on the MinGW build, very nice.
Stephen Leake wrote:
> Instructions for MinGW for monotone bundled are in
> monotone.web/wiki/Building/Windows/MinGW.mdwn; 137 lines. Adding the
> info for stripped at a similar level of detail will take about another
> 50 lines.
>
> Doe
17 matches
Mail list logo
