Re: [Monotone-devel] [ANNOUNCE] monotone 0.26pre3 released

2006-04-04 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 15:23, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 09:48:52PM +0400, Petr Ovtchenkov wrote: > > > mtn --db=venge.mtn db init > > > mtn --db=venge.mtn pull venge.net "net.venge.monotone*" --exclude > > > net.venge.mono

Re: [Monotone-devel] [ANNOUNCE] monotone 0.26pre3 released

2006-03-30 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
On Thursday 30 March 2006 04:38, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > The monotone team is happy to announce the release of monotone > 0.26pre3, available at the usual places: > http://venge.net/monotone > http://venge.net/monotone/downloads/monotone-0.26pre3.tar.gz > > This should be the last pre-release

Re: [Monotone-devel] [ANNOUNCE] monotone 0.26pre3 released

2006-03-30 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
On Thursday 30 March 2006 04:38, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > The monotone team is happy to announce the release of monotone > 0.26pre3, available at the usual places: > http://venge.net/monotone > http://venge.net/monotone/downloads/monotone-0.26pre3.tar.gz > > This should be the last pre-release

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [PATCH] pre-cache database file to improve response time

2006-03-27 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 06:50, Joe Wilson wrote: > > I find this to be a strange and unconvincing argument. > Monotone developers may find it offensive, but many of its > users who currently have issue with the speed of monotone would not. > If you have the free RAM available, you might as wel

Re: [Monotone-devel] [PATCH] pre-cache database file to improve response time

2006-03-20 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
On Monday 20 March 2006 23:57, Johan Bolmsjö wrote: > Joe Wilson wrote: > > >--- Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Joe Wilson wrote: > >> > >> > >>Modern OSes have support for hints to the OS. For mmap() calls on > >>Linux, there is the MAP_POPULATE flag. For all file o

Re: [Monotone-devel] clarifications about bookkeeping dir

2006-03-20 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
On Friday 17 March 2006 11:35, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 09:16:14AM +0300, Petr Ovtchenkov wrote: > > On Thursday 16 March 2006 01:13, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:22:11PM +0100, Jon Bright wrote: > > > > At least

Re: [Monotone-devel] clarifications about bookkeeping dir

2006-03-16 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
On Thursday 16 March 2006 01:13, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:22:11PM +0100, Jon Bright wrote: > > At least for Win32, this isn't an issue. It's not going to try and > > execute the directory. I don't know about ancient MacOS filesystems or > > VMS. Richard? > > For a c

Re: [Monotone-devel] What the status of 0.26?

2006-03-10 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
On Thursday 09 March 2006 15:08, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 09:44:50AM +0300, Petr Ovtchenkov wrote: > > May be I miss something, but can you clarify the status of 0.26 and > > procedure of pull from venge.net? > > > > [the reason of question i

[Monotone-devel] What the status of 0.26?

2006-03-08 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
May be I miss something, but can you clarify the status of 0.26 and procedure of pull from venge.net? [the reason of question is a problems with pull with 0.26pre1 client, inspired by two heads in net.venge.monotone branch]. Thanks, - Petr Ovtchenkov

Re: [Monotone-devel] Copy-on-write not mandated!

2006-01-24 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
On Sunday 22 January 2006 15:30, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 08:53:45AM +0100, Clemens Hintze wrote: > > Sorry for bothering, but - while it is true, that the C++ standard was > > written in a manner that allow copy-on-write technics for implementation > > of basic_string, it

[Monotone-devel] Re: network costs of history copying

2006-01-17 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
Hello Nathaniel, > I just did a pull of net.venge.monotone alone, to test. (Some of > the contrib branches contain some rather large stuff, like a copy of a > bunch of big 3rd-party java libraries, so I left those out to get a > fair test). Netsync transferred 25.6 megabytes. What branches you

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [announce] 0.26pre1 released; venge.net migrated

2006-01-16 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
On Monday 16 January 2006 21:46, Peter Simons wrote: > Nathaniel Smith writes: > > > Monotone 0.26pre1 has been released. > > I tried to connect to venge.net to get the revision tree, > but the port seems to be blacklisted: > > | $ telnet venge.net 5253 > | Trying 66.96.28.3... > | telnet: U

Re: [Monotone-devel] Monotone server unreachable

2006-01-16 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
On Monday 16 January 2006 13:34, Daniel Carosone wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 10:50:09AM +0300, Petr Ovtchenkov wrote: > > > > telnet www.venge.net 5253 > > Trying 66.96.28.3... > > You may have missed a recent announcement on the mailing list. > http://lists

[Monotone-devel] Monotone server unreachable

2006-01-15 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
Hello! I can't pull from venge.net server more, host unreachable. The web server work fine (but reply come from off.net, while request was to www.venge.net). > traceroute venge.net traceroute to venge.net (66.96.28.3), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets 1 * * * 2 mpls1-giga1-2.msk.corbina.net (85.2

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Proposal for human readable revision IDs

2005-09-13 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
I would focus that 'human readable revision ID' intended not only to see on 568b-2462-456e-9a57-4326-93df-936d-4835 (IMHO this not more useful than 568b2462456e9a57432693df936d4835), but to make visible revisions sequence/relations: revision '1' is older that revision '2'; But what you can say ab

[Monotone-devel] compile with STLport; patch

2005-08-24 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
Summary: The attached patch (against monotone-0.22) add - support of STLport - set position of Boost's headers during configure - set position of Boost's libs during configure ChangeLog entry: 2005-08-24 Petr Ovtchenkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Mak

[Monotone-devel] complexity of the attack on SHA-1 reduced

2005-08-19 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
Just for info. The time complexity of the attack on SHA-1 reduced up to 2^63. (Their previous result was 2^69; brute force is 2^80). http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/08/new_cryptanalyt.html - ptr ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Netsync performance improvement patch

2005-08-15 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
On Tuesday 16 August 2005 05:30, graydon hoare wrote: > > You might like the SGI "rope" class, which appears on my system as > part of gnu libstdc++, /usr/include/c++/4.0.0/ext/rope > Design of strings in libstd++ was derived from SGI's rope. So replacement of GNU strings by SGI's rope has no sen

Re: [Monotone-devel] Netsync performance improvement patch

2005-08-15 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
On Monday 15 August 2005 12:36, Eric Anderson wrote: > The main problem as I saw it with a non-contigous implementation was > that it would be more complex than the contigous one, and that > complexity would only give a benefit if the non-contigous structure > was pushed much further into the code

[Monotone-devel] C++ standard conformation

2005-05-24 Thread Petr Ovtchenkov
Good luck everybody! I made build of Monotone 0.19 with STLport (5.0, CVS) (STL implementation, http://www.stlport.org/cgi-bin/forum/dcboard.cgi) and found some C++-standard incompatibilities in Monotone's code. The patch is suggested here. General problem was absent of direct #include fo