Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 05:53:07PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > I'm attempting to give people a clean way to mark a revision as
> > "no-longer-a-head-for-branch-X". There are two use cases for a feature
> > like this one:
> >
> > 1) To ignore old
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In discussions on IRC, we decided to try to implement at least the
> first case with a new certificate type, tentatively named a
> "prune-branch" certificate by dscherger.
Oh one minor note, because the certificate says "do not consider
this revision a
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm attempting to give people a clean way to mark a revision as
> "no-longer-a-head-for-branch-X". There are two use cases for a feature
> like this one:
>
> 1) To ignore old branches which have subsequently been merged into the
> mainline.
> 2) To mar
Introduction
We are thinking of changing from CVS to monotone.
This will impact our way of working and I am
trying to figure out what the best way is of
utilizing monotone.
Thinking about is led to a short wishlist
for monotone. If you are only interested in
the wishlist, just jum
