On 10/10/07, Ralf S. Engelschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I propose to simply
> > > skip the first line of stderr during output comparisons:
> >
> > That's the right fix in principle but I think there is a more elegant
> > way to implement it. Stay tuned...
>
> Yes, that's what I expected.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On 10/10/07, Ralf S. Engelschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A "make check" on h:n.v.m currently results in one failed test:
> > "syntax_errors_in_.mtn-ignore". The reasons is because the test performs
> > a "mtn ls unknown" command and checks the st
On 10/10/07, Ralf S. Engelschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A "make check" on h:n.v.m currently results in one failed test:
> "syntax_errors_in_.mtn-ignore". The reasons is because the test performs
> a "mtn ls unknown" command and checks the stderr output. Unfortunately,
> it doesn't seem to be
A "make check" on h:n.v.m currently results in one failed test:
"syntax_errors_in_.mtn-ignore". The reasons is because the test performs
a "mtn ls unknown" command and checks the stderr output. Unfortunately,
it doesn't seem to be deterministic in what order the files are checked
against the Lua fu
