On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 11:59:27AM -0700, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
snip
> > 2) --depth as param name ok?
>
> I'm dubious. It's pretty confusing if --depth sometimes refers to the
> ancestry graph, and sometimes refers to the filesystem layout. It's
> especially bad, since 'log' presumably takes
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 10:31:31PM -0400, Joel Reed wrote:
> A few questions:
>
> 1) functionality look ok?
Yep.
> 2) --depth as param name ok?
I'm dubious. It's pretty confusing if --depth sometimes refers to the
ancestry graph, and sometimes refers to the filesystem layout. It's
especially
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:09:24PM -0600, Derek Scherger wrote:
> Joel Reed wrote:
> > (%:~/tmp/root) monotone --db=../mt.db --depth=1 ls known .
> > file
> >
> > (%:~/tmp/root) monotone --db=../mt.db --depth=2 ls known .
> > a/file
> > file
> >
> > (%:~/tmp/root) monotone --db=../mt.db --depth=
Joel Reed wrote:
> (%:~/tmp/root) monotone --db=../mt.db --depth=1 ls known .
> file
>
> (%:~/tmp/root) monotone --db=../mt.db --depth=2 ls known .
> a/file
> file
>
> (%:~/tmp/root) monotone --db=../mt.db --depth=3 ls known .
> a/b/file
> a/file
> file
I'm not sure if ls known is considered a
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 15 May 2005 22:31:31 -0400, Joel Reed
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
joelwreed> (%:~/tmp/root) monotone --db=../mt.db --depth=1 ls known .
joelwreed> file
joelwreed>
joelwreed> (%:~/tmp/root) monotone --db=../mt.db --depth=2 ls known .
joelwreed> a/file
joelwre
I took a look at adding support for limiting monotone's recursive
predilections, which seems to be important option for some. I need
it for better zsh file completion. Anyway I was able to add it in
suprisingly few (to me at least) # of lines.
I used --depth=X as the option and tested the code by
