Re: [Monotone-devel] Compiling from source

2005-10-14 Thread Zbynek Winkler
Ethan Blanton wrote: Zbynek Winkler spake unto us the following wisdom: Ok, the problem seems to be boost-1.32. It is linked with libstdc++.so.5 but gcc-4.0 uses libstdc++.so.6 so the resulting executable links to both and that seems to be the problem :( So, I installed boost-dev (1.33) f

Re: [Monotone-devel] Compiling from source

2005-10-13 Thread Ethan Blanton
Zbynek Winkler spake unto us the following wisdom: > Ok, the problem seems to be boost-1.32. It is linked with libstdc++.so.5 > but gcc-4.0 uses libstdc++.so.6 so the resulting executable links to > both and that seems to be the problem :( > > So, I installed boost-dev (1.33) from debian unstabl

Re: [Monotone-devel] Compiling from source

2005-10-13 Thread Zbynek Winkler
Zbynek Winkler wrote: Do I have some library mismatch? ldd monotone says: $ ldd monotone linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000) libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0xb7f0e000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0xb7f0a000) libboost_regex-gcc-mt-1_32.so.1.32.0 => /usr/lib/lib

Re: [Monotone-devel] Compiling from source

2005-10-13 Thread Emile Snyder
I believe I had exactly this problem on a newer redhat system at work. I don't pretend to understand exactly what's going on, but for me it appeared that /lib/tls/libc.so.6 didn't like exceptions at all (a trivial small test program that tried throwing and catching an exception died in the same way

[Monotone-devel] Compiling from source

2005-10-13 Thread Zbynek Winkler
Hello, I've managed to compile latest monotone (took about 45min) with gcc-4.0.2 (BTW: thanks the great INSTALL instructions!). Something changed since the last time I tried. Either gcc has improved in memory consumption or the sources changed in away that it takes less memory to compile (the