On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 12:16 -0800, Rob Schoening wrote:
> On windows I notice that that whole-workspace operations (ls unknown,
> ls missing, commit, etc.) often take 10-20x longer when they have not
> been run recently whereas a subsequnt execution (moments later) will
> return very quickly.
>
>
On windows I notice that that whole-workspace operations (ls unknown, ls
missing, commit, etc.) often take 10-20x longer when they have not been run
recently whereas a subsequnt execution (moments later) will return very
quickly.
Does monotone retain a cache someplace or is this performance diffe
