Hi all,
I'm busy scratching mtn itches. Another on my list is that I tend
to refrain from using branches as very lightweight objects because
they never go away. Now, the mythical policy branches were touted as
a solution to this, but I must admit I don't have a clear idea of how
On 07/07/2007, at 20:53, William Uther wrote:
The meaning of suspend is not this is a bad revision: we
already have test failure for that. The meaning is I don't want
mtn to bother me with this revision.
Or I don't want other users to bother with this revision because
it's dead,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 7 Jul 2007 11:53:35 -0700, William Uther
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
willu.mailingListsAnyway, I have another proposed solution. It
willu.mailingLists is a 'suspend' cert. It looks the same as a
willu.mailingLists 'branch' cert in that it contains the name
On 07/07/2007, at 12:10 PM, Richard Levitte wrote:
willu.mailingLists ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Color_of_the_bikeshed )
It should be clear by now that the bikeshed must be colored violet
with pink dots.
Green!
On 07/07/2007, at 12:02 PM, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
Shouldn't it
William Uther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Anyway, I have another proposed solution. It is a 'suspend' cert.
It looks the same as a 'branch' cert in that it contains the name of
a branch. The effect of a 'suspend' cert is to remove that revision
from any list of heads for that
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 7 Jul 2007 13:35:07 -0700, William Uther
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
willu.mailingLists On 07/07/2007, at 12:10 PM, Richard Levitte wrote:
willu.mailingLists
willu.mailingLists Only one, really: how do we handle irresponsable
willu.mailingLists usage of that
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 11:53:35AM -0700, William Uther wrote:
I'm busy scratching mtn itches.
Excellent.
Anyway, I have another proposed solution. It is a 'suspend' cert.
It looks the same as a 'branch' cert in that it contains the name
of a branch. The effect of a 'suspend' cert is
