Is there a description somewhere just what rosters are? The last word I
remember on the subject many months ago was that they were an internal
data structure that was hard to explain. Has there been any movement
on the explanation front since then?
-- hendrik
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a description somewhere just what rosters are? The last word I
remember on the subject many months ago was that they were an internal
data structure that was hard to explain. Has there been any movement
on the explanation front since then?
Yeah, I'd like to
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 16:18 +0200, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a description somewhere just what rosters are? The last word I
remember on the subject many months ago was that they were an internal
data structure that was hard to explain. Has there been any
I went ahaed an added your answer to the Glossary on the wiki, Tim.
This question had been nagging at me for some time as well. ;-)
RS
On 9/8/06, Timothy Brownawell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 16:18 +0200, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 01:47:58AM -0700, Graydon Hoare wrote:
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Thanks for looking it over -- I know you don't have much time these
days :-).
s/have/make/. It'd be dishonest to claim innocence; I'm just not
allocating as much time for this stuff anymore.
A
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 02:24:00PM -0700, Graydon Hoare wrote:
First off: fantastic work!
I only have minor nit-picky comments at this point; as far as the plan
we've been discussing, this looks basically perfect, I'm surprised you
got it done so fast.
Thanks for looking it over -- I know
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
The change is very large -- 32 files changed, 2387 insertions(+), 1073
deletions(-) -- and messes about with some very important pieces. In
particular, if there are bugs in roster reconstruction, that could
jeopardize our sanity checking generally. So, I'd really