Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 08:00:45PM +0200, Bruno Hertz wrote:
>> > Yes, but just because there's a subtle technical difference doesn't
>> > mean that people don't expect them to work the same, and won't
>> > make mistakes, experience confusion, etc. if
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 08:00:45PM +0200, Bruno Hertz wrote:
> > Yes, but just because there's a subtle technical difference doesn't
> > mean that people don't expect them to work the same, and won't
> > make mistakes, experience confusion, etc. if they don't...
>
> I think it's safe to assume you
Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 12:04:57AM -0700, David Brown wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 May 2005 20:39:31 -0700, Nuno Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >I understand your point. On the other hand there is no way to be fully
>> >sure they will always be t
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 12:04:57AM -0700, David Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 13 May 2005 20:39:31 -0700, Nuno Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >I understand your point. On the other hand there is no way to be fully
> >sure they will always be the same, as "*" is a shell thing and it's up
> >to t
--no-ignore ? I belive other systems use a similiar option?
Joel
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 11:40:37AM +0100, Nuno Lucas wrote:
[13-05-2005 0:08, David Brown escreveu]
On Thu, 12 May 2005 13:17:56 -0700, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
I encountered this as a problem with 'arch'
Joel Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 01:35:58PM +0200, Bruno Hertz wrote:
>
> snip
>
>> So finally answering your question, while feeling that I'm becoming
>> quite repetitive at the same time, when I talk about limiting list
>> anything to a directory in such a use case
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 01:35:58PM +0200, Bruno Hertz wrote:
snip
> So finally answering your question, while feeling that I'm becoming
> quite repetitive at the same time, when I talk about limiting list
> anything to a directory in such a use case I of course mean a
> directory without the subd
Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 02:36:38AM +0200, Bruno Hertz wrote:
>> Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:47:09AM +0200, Bruno Hertz wrote:
>> >> Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > How could
On Fri, 13 May 2005 20:39:31 -0700, Nuno Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I understand your point. On the other hand there is no way to be fully
sure they will always be the same, as "*" is a shell thing and it's up
to the shell to return us the same as . would do (for example, I could
have a sh
[14-05-2005 1:05, Nathaniel Smith escreveu]
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 11:40:37AM +0100, Nuno Lucas wrote:
I'm one of those that decided to use monotone to version my /etc dir
and have this same problem with a /etc/init.d/net.lo file. Monotone
simply refuses to add it because it is an "ignorable" file
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 11:40:37AM +0100, Nuno Lucas wrote:
> [13-05-2005 0:08, David Brown escreveu]
> >On Thu, 12 May 2005 13:17:56 -0700, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
> >I encountered this as a problem with 'arch', though, because their
> >default ignore list has 'core' as a file to ignore.
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 02:36:38AM +0200, Bruno Hertz wrote:
> Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:47:09AM +0200, Bruno Hertz wrote:
> >> Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > How could "list unknown" behave that would be useful in this
>
[13-05-2005 0:08, David Brown escreveu]
On Thu, 12 May 2005 13:17:56 -0700, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
I encountered this as a problem with 'arch', though, because their
default ignore list has 'core' as a file to ignore. It also ignores
the entire net/core directory when importing the li
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 12 May 2005 16:08:27 -0700, "David
Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
monotone> On Thu, 12 May 2005 13:17:56 -0700, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
monotone> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
monotone>
monotone> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 11 May
mono
"Bruno Hertz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:47:09AM +0200, Bruno Hertz wrote:
>>> Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>> > How could "list unknown" behave that would be useful in this
>>> > situation?
>>>
>>
Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:47:09AM +0200, Bruno Hertz wrote:
>> Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > How could "list unknown" behave that would be useful in this
>> > situation?
>>
>> If it was possbile to constrain it to a specific di
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 04:08:27PM -0700, David Brown wrote:
> On Thu, 12 May 2005 13:17:56 -0700, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 11 May
> >2005 18:34:44 -0700, Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> >njs> On that
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 04:08:27PM -0700, David Brown wrote:
> I encountered this as a problem with 'arch', though, because their default
> ignore list has 'core' as a file to ignore. It also ignores the entire
> net/core directory when importing the linux kernel.
Ouch! Thanks for the warnin
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:47:09AM +0200, Bruno Hertz wrote:
> Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > How could "list unknown" behave that would be useful in this
> > situation?
>
> If it was possbile to constrain it to a specific directory, it could
> very well make sense. For example
Emile Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, the fact that a revision refers to the state of a tree of files
> makes it, in my mind at least, about versioning trees of files. I'm not
> saying that you can't use it for what you wish, just that it's not a
> perfect impedance match.
Well, what
On Thu, 12 May 2005 13:17:56 -0700, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 11 May
2005 18:34:44 -0700, Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
njs> On that point, though -- would it make sense to people that, if
njs> ignore_file retur
Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How could "list unknown" behave that would be useful in this
> situation?
If it was possbile to constrain it to a specific directory, it could
very well make sense. For example together with an analogue of Emacs
PCL-CVS mode for monotone.
Regards, Br
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 13:46, Bruno Hertz wrote:
> Emile Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 06:39, Bruno Hertz wrote:
> >> What we are talking about here is situations where files under
> >> revision control are sparse in a directory tree. As an example,
> >> consider pu
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 03:39:20PM +0200, Bruno Hertz wrote:
> What we are talking about here is situations where files under
> revision control are sparse in a directory tree. As an example,
> consider putting your home directory under revision control for files
> like ~/.profile or ~/.emacs. In s
Emile Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 06:39, Bruno Hertz wrote:
>> What we are talking about here is situations where files under
>> revision control are sparse in a directory tree. As an example,
>> consider putting your home directory under revision control for files
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 11 May 2005 18:34:44 -0700, Nathaniel
Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
njs> On that point, though -- would it make sense to people that, if
njs> ignore_file returned 'true' when given a directory, that
njs> everything inside that directory should therefore be
Emile Snyder writes:
>> As an example, consider putting your home directory
>> under revision control for files like ~/.profile or
>> ~/.emacs.
> Given that monotone is about versioning trees of files,
> this seems kinda like twisting it out of it's groove to
> me.
Actually, that's one of
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 06:39, Bruno Hertz wrote:
> What we are talking about here is situations where files under
> revision control are sparse in a directory tree. As an example,
> consider putting your home directory under revision control for files
> like ~/.profile or ~/.emacs. In such a scenari
Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:28:37AM +0200, Bruno Hertz wrote:
>> Apropos a recent discussion, would this patch prevent monotone from
>> scanning a whole directory tree if the top level dir itself matches an
>> ignore pattern?
>
> It's orthogonal.
>
> On
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:28:37AM +0200, Bruno Hertz wrote:
> Apropos a recent discussion, would this patch prevent monotone from
> scanning a whole directory tree if the top level dir itself matches an
> ignore pattern?
It's orthogonal.
On that point, though -- would it make sense to people tha
Martin Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I've just made a patch to support the '.mt-ignore' file. It's a simple
> file which contains one regular expression per line. Do you have any
> objections against making it a standard way to describe ignored files?
>
> I also attached Lua code to
31 matches
Mail list logo
