Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 07:29:14PM +0200, Wim Oudshoorn wrote:
>> Timothy Brownawell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > But A *is* the least common ancestor (M->K->B->A; N->L->D->A). That
>> > it's also an ancestor of a more distant common ancestor doesn
Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 09:48:06AM +0200, Wim Oudshoorn wrote:
>> Yes indeed. But a looked at the code a little and although
>> the lca code I more or less undestand, I can't figure
>> out what lcad is doing.
>>
>> Is there some precise specificati
Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 03:37:38PM +0200, Wim Oudshoorn wrote:
>> However in that case lcad has a bug :-)
>
> Err, yep, sounds like it. Sigh.
>
>> I have database with this example (artifically constructed).
>
> I guess I should ask if you could turn
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Wim Oudshoorn:
>
>> However in that case lcad has a bug :-)
>>
>> Consider the following graph:
>>
>> A
>> / \
>> B C
>> | /|
>> | / E
>> D |\
>>
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 09:48:06AM +0200, Wim Oudshoorn wrote:
> Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It doesn't make much of a difference for anything
> > that monotone uses its LCA algorithm for, though; in fact, "nearest
> > common ancestor" is probably better. (We just use LCA when
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 03:37:38PM +0200, Wim Oudshoorn wrote:
> However in that case lcad has a bug :-)
Err, yep, sounds like it. Sigh.
> I have database with this example (artifically constructed).
I guess I should ask if you could turn it into an automated test case?
Though part of me would
* Wim Oudshoorn:
> However in that case lcad has a bug :-)
>
> Consider the following graph:
>
> A
> / \
> B C
> | /|
> | / E
> D |\
> | F \
> | | G
>
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 09:19:19PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Wim Oudshoorn:
>
> > However in that case lcad has a bug :-)
> >
> > Consider the following graph:
> >
> > A
> > / \
> > B C
> > | /|
> > | / E
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 09:29:22PM +0200, Wim Oudshoorn wrote:
> Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 03:37:38PM +0200, Wim Oudshoorn wrote:
> >> However in that case lcad has a bug :-)
> >
> > Err, yep, sounds like it. Sigh.
> >
> >> I have database with this
