[Monotone-devel] Re: FreeBSD's requirements for its future VCS

2008-05-31 Thread Lapo Luchini
Lapo Luchini wrote: http://wikitest.freebsd.org/VersionControl This page (and the linked ones) details the features that FreeBSD requires (or would like to have) in its chosen successor of CVS. In the end they seem to have chosen SVN, as I noticed this morning on the CIA rss feed: https://ci

[Monotone-devel] Re: FreeBSD's requirements for its future VCS

2006-11-14 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian May wrote: > I can think of two evil reasons: > > * somebody committed data without permission and copyright owner is > jumping up and down threatening legal action if it isn't removed > immediately. AFAIK, this is the case they're concerned wi

[Monotone-devel] Re: FreeBSD's requirements for its future VCS

2006-10-07 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > (1) monotone should be put in the list on page Existing Version > Control Systems http://wikitest.freebsd.org/VersionControl I was waiting to put some more specific pages but.. well, I just did ;-) > (2) http://wikitest.fre

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: FreeBSD's requirements for its future VCS

2006-10-06 Thread hendrik
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:50:17PM +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Daniel Carosone wrote: > > I've made a start, creating an EvaluationFeatures top-level page that > > should index all the other FeatureFoo pages, a FeatureTemplate page > > and a hal

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: FreeBSD's requirements for its future VCS

2006-10-05 Thread Daniel Carosone
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:50:17PM +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote: > Daniel Carosone wrote: > > I've made a start, creating an EvaluationFeatures top-level page that > > should index all the other FeatureFoo pages, a FeatureTemplate page > > and a half-dozen or so (so far) FeatureFoo pages. > Whoo, you

[Monotone-devel] Re: FreeBSD's requirements for its future VCS

2006-10-05 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Carosone wrote: > I've made a start, creating an EvaluationFeatures top-level page that > should index all the other FeatureFoo pages, a FeatureTemplate page > and a half-dozen or so (so far) FeatureFoo pages. Whoo, you work fast, I couldn't def

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: FreeBSD's requirements for its future VCS

2006-10-04 Thread Daniel Carosone
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 08:22:21AM +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote: > #2 has the slight problem that FreeBSD's wiki is still in "test" and, > thus, only editable by authorized accounts, but while we elaborate on > the descriptions I'm working to have my account enabled or, at the > very least, I will ask

[Monotone-devel] Re: FreeBSD's requirements for its future VCS

2006-10-03 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Carosone wrote: > I'm not sure what the best way to proceed from here is, or whether > someone else has made further progress on monotone-specific answers. > Please respond if you're working on this so we can collaborate. I can > see that we mi

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: FreeBSD's requirements for its future VCS

2006-10-03 Thread Daniel Carosone
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:36:41AM +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote: > Lapo Luchini wrote: > > http://wikitest.freebsd.org/VersionControl > > My personal analysis of monotone vs wanted features" (very rough): Thankyou, this is a great start. I think it would be great to put together a consolidated resp

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: FreeBSD's requirements for its future VCS

2006-09-28 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:12:16AM +0100, Bruce Stephens wrote: > And doing something or other so that syncing doesn't just revive them, > and so that everyone else syncing gets an opportunity to conveniently > move the revisions too (including transplanting any descendents that > they have that we

Fwd: [Monotone-devel] Re: FreeBSD's requirements for its future VCS

2006-09-28 Thread Zack Weinberg
meant to send to list, rrgh -- Forwarded message -- From: Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sep 28, 2006 9:34 PM Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: FreeBSD's requirements for its future VCS To: Bruce Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 9/28/06, Bruce Stephens

[Monotone-devel] Re: FreeBSD's requirements for its future VCS

2006-09-28 Thread Bruce Stephens
Lapo Luchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >> VCSFeatureObliterate: Obliterate functionality, to remove complete >> content and history from the repository in the event of import >> errors, policy decisions to remove content, etc > > kill_* commands can do that, but a local file sync is then

[Monotone-devel] Re: FreeBSD's requirements for its future VCS

2006-09-28 Thread Lapo Luchini
Lapo Luchini wrote: > http://wikitest.freebsd.org/VersionControl My personal analysis of monotone vs wanted features" (very rough): > VCSFeatureCVSImport: Ability to import entire current CVS repository, > including history our cvs_import would almost suffice, branch reconstruction would be a pl

[Monotone-devel] Re: FreeBSD's requirements for its future VCS

2006-09-28 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lapo Luchini schreef: > http://wikitest.freebsd.org/VersionControl > > This page (and the linked ones) details the features that FreeBSD > requires (or would like to have) in its chosen successor of CVS. > It would be neat to be a candidate ;-) > Or,