Stephen Leake wrote:
>> So, yes, a Cygwin-1.7 monotone-0.45 package will be available shortly
>> after the release.
> Excellent; thanks for your work.
It is released, on mirrors, and announced. =)
> I think it would be good to add at least a note in INSTALL about how
> to build the Cygwin package
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Lapo Luchini wrote:
>>> % make monotone.pot
>>> make: *** No rule to make target `monotone.pot'. Stop.
>>
>> This has been changed to
>> $ make $LANG.po-update
>> in the past.
Both targets exist and do different things.
> Mhh, nay: the both of them (the latter
Thomas Keller wrote:
> Lapo Luchini schrieb:
>> Thomas Keller wrote:
>>> [...] and complete your translations.
>> Uh? This used to work...
>>
>> % make monotone.pot
>> make: *** No rule to make target `monotone.pot'. Stop.
>
> This has been changed to
> $ make $LANG.po-update
> in the past.
Mhh,
Lapo Luchini writes:
> Lapo Luchini wrote:
>> Oh but that part is as ready and as easy as "cygport monotone-0.44 all"
>> the main show-stopper for a cygwin monotone 0.44+ package is the lack of
>> lua and botan as packages.
>
> I stand corrected: BOTH DO EXIST on Cygwin-1.7.
> lua one was made (a
Thomas Keller wrote:
> Very cool, could you or Stephe please try to compile and test the
> current development version beforehand on Cygwin so we do not see any
> showstoppers there for the actual release?
Sure.
I'm compiling b13449292bbdcadf9f1e6515faaeee5fffc1ce7d and make test,
will report late
Lapo Luchini schrieb:
> Lapo Luchini wrote:
>> Oh but that part is as ready and as easy as "cygport monotone-0.44 all"
>> the main show-stopper for a cygwin monotone 0.44+ package is the lack of
>> lua and botan as packages.
>
> I stand corrected: BOTH DO EXIST on Cygwin-1.7.
> lua one was made (a
Lapo Luchini wrote:
> Oh but that part is as ready and as easy as "cygport monotone-0.44 all"
> the main show-stopper for a cygwin monotone 0.44+ package is the lack of
> lua and botan as packages.
I stand corrected: BOTH DO EXIST on Cygwin-1.7.
lua one was made (as promised) by Yaakov since the l
Stephen Leake wrote:
> I can help put it together. At the very least, I'd like to see a
> README.Cygwin documenting what is known so far about building the
> Cygwin package.
Oh but that part is as ready and as easy as "cygport monotone-0.44 all"
the main show-stopper for a cygwin monotone 0.44+ pa
Thomas Keller wrote:
> Lapo Luchini schrieb:
>> % make monotone.pot
>> make: *** No rule to make target `monotone.pot'. Stop.
>
> This has been changed to
> $ make $LANG.po-update
> in the past.
I was misled by the fact that the former STLL WORKS on FreeBSD (using
GNU Make), though it does not o
Lapo Luchini schrieb:
> Thomas Keller wrote:
>> [...] and complete your translations.
>
> Uh? This used to work...
>
> % make monotone.pot
> make: *** No rule to make target `monotone.pot'. Stop.
This has been changed to
$ make $LANG.po-update
in the past.
>> It would be also cool if the bui
Thomas Keller wrote:
> [...] and complete your translations.
Uh? This used to work...
% make monotone.pot
make: *** No rule to make target `monotone.pot'. Stop.
> It would be also cool if the buildbots could receive some love until
> then, [...] (missing boost on freebsd 7
I don't know how tha
Stephen Leake schrieb:
> Peter Stirling writes:
>
>> I have an OS X machine (ppc) and Vista as well, what would be
>> required to run a build bot?
>
> There used to be a wiki page describing this, but it seems to be gone.
Its not gone, its just very hidden (a tiny link on the general BuildBot
w
Peter Stirling writes:
> I have an OS X machine (ppc) and Vista as well, what would be
> required to run a build bot?
There used to be a wiki page describing this, but it seems to be gone.
I captured that info in a document I use at work; see
http://gds.gsfc.nasa.gov/tools_install_windows.pdf s
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 05:35:51PM +0100, Thomas Keller wrote:
> Richard Levitte schrieb:
> > H, fiancée... you're taking things into unexpected proportions,
> > especially considering you're talking with someone for whom marriage
> > is impossible (at least with current legislation)... Or is
I have an OS X machine (ppc) and Vista as well, what would be
required to run a build bot?
On 14 Dec 2008, at 7:28 am, Richard Levitte wrote:
Hello, and apologies for my absence.
I wasn't that far away, but I've had a bit too much life to be able to
focus on monotone for a couple of months (bas
Richard Levitte schrieb:
> H, fiancée... you're taking things into unexpected proportions,
> especially considering you're talking with someone for whom marriage
> is impossible (at least with current legislation)... Or is it a
> german thing to call a girlfriend (or boyfriend, should that be
In message <49450bb1.5090...@thomaskeller.biz> on Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:35:45
+0100, Thomas Keller said:
me> Richard Levitte schrieb:
me> > Hello, and apologies for my absence.
me> > I wasn't that far away, but I've had a bit too much life to be
me> > able to focus on monotone for a couple of mont
Richard Levitte schrieb:
> Hello, and apologies for my absence.
> I wasn't that far away, but I've had a bit too much life to be able to
> focus on monotone for a couple of months (basically since late
> October). A new love and habits, routines and so on forming and
> changing around that, plus t
Hello, and apologies for my absence.
I wasn't that far away, but I've had a bit too much life to be able to
focus on monotone for a couple of months (basically since late
October). A new love and habits, routines and so on forming and
changing around that, plus the habitual slower tempo of winter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timothy Brownawell schrieb:
> On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 13:01 +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
>> Thomas Keller wrote:
>>> AFAIR Matt did a small, but very noticable change wrt merging in
>>> 139613dd1ee3f2c7e4b0578aaacf1d8a67f240d9. We got pretty often complain
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 13:01 +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
> Thomas Keller wrote:
> > AFAIR Matt did a small, but very noticable change wrt merging in
> > 139613dd1ee3f2c7e4b0578aaacf1d8a67f240d9. We got pretty often complains
> > that a complex merge result was abandoned just because no or a wrong ke
Thomas Keller wrote:
> AFAIR Matt did a small, but very noticable change wrt merging in
> 139613dd1ee3f2c7e4b0578aaacf1d8a67f240d9. We got pretty often complains
> that a complex merge result was abandoned just because no or a wrong key
> was given.
Another IMHO NEWS-worthy merge-related news is t
22 matches
Mail list logo
