On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 01:49 +, Boris wrote:
Hugo Cornelis wrote:
Well, what I really want to do is have a mechanism that automatically
distributes the necessary hooks from one central point. For sure the
members of the same team need the same trust policies, local
alterations not
On 12/2/06, Oren Ben-Kiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 01:49 +, Boris wrote:
Hugo Cornelis wrote:
Well, what I really want to do is have a mechanism that automatically
distributes the necessary hooks from one central point. For sure the
members of the same team need
Oren Ben-Kiki wrote:
[...]
I guess it does not belong to monotone. As you even want to forbid
developers to change trust policies I think a distributed revision
control system is not what you want. What monotone does is copying
data between databases. Once it is there revisions can be
Oren == Oren Ben-Kiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oren Sounds strange to me. I'd expect the trust policy and (all?
Oren some?) of the hooks to be part of the data that monotone
Oren allows copying between the databases.
You have to be very careful about putting hooks directly into
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 12:24:27AM -0600, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 17:06 +1100, Brian May wrote:
Daniel == Daniel Carosone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel Again, it's not about permissions to change things, it's
Daniel about whether your trust (ie, how
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 11:32 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 12:24:27AM -0600, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 17:06 +1100, Brian May wrote:
Daniel == Daniel Carosone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel Again, it's not about permissions to
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:49:25AM -0600, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 11:32 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 12:24:27AM -0600, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 17:06 +1100, Brian May wrote:
Daniel == Daniel Carosone [EMAIL
Hugo Cornelis wrote:
I did not see such a thing like 'certs' with other version control
systems (I could obviously be wrong on this), but, because certs allow
for many different types of user defined workflows, it is exactly the
reason why I started using monotone.
There is a learning curve
Boris == Boris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Boris Question: There is no way (and I assume no need) to set
Boris write-permissions per user? I don't see anything in the
Boris documentation that I can use pattern and allow in
Boris write-permissions, too?
I would assume you would
Daniel == Daniel Carosone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel Again, it's not about permissions to change things, it's
Daniel about whether your trust (ie, how you pay attention to)
Daniel what they do.
Daniel In this context, this means that everyone accepts changes
Daniel in
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 17:06 +1100, Brian May wrote:
Daniel == Daniel Carosone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel Again, it's not about permissions to change things, it's
Daniel about whether your trust (ie, how you pay attention to)
Daniel what they do.
Daniel In this
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 12:24:27AM -0600, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 17:06 +1100, Brian May wrote:
What happens if a trusted developer's key becomes compromised
(e.g. laptop stolen) or the developer becomes untrustworthy
(e.g. fired)?
Can you somehow say that old
12 matches
Mail list logo