Eric Niebler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you're not going to be removing regex all together, and you're not going
to
write your own regex engine, so monotone will still depend on an external
library (e.g. pcre), why try and remove the dependency on the boost regex
library?
boost::regex in
On 7/16/07, Anthony Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few observations. You don't need to build boost.regex separately, or
any boost library for that matter. You could simply add its sources to
your own project and compile it in. You certainly don't need to compile
boost.regex with ICU
Zack Weinberg wrote:
On 7/16/07, Anthony Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few observations. You don't need to build boost.regex separately, or
any boost library for that matter. You could simply add its sources to
your own project and compile it in. You certainly don't need to compile
Justin Patrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IIRC there are 2 major reasons we're trying to remove the non-geader
stuff in boost.
1) It's a huge stumbling block for people installing monotone. Boost
tends to be a huge pain to build for many people on many platforms.
This seems to have gotten
Zack Weinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 7/12/07, Anthony Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zack Weinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is that the problem --- the external libraries? If so, then people at boost
would like to know. There's always discussion about whether libraries should
be
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:34:45PM +0200, Ulf Ochsenfahrt wrote:
I'm currently using a statically compiled binary of monotone which
weights in at 40 MB. I wanted to get the huge db fix on my laptop, and
the easiest way was to do a static compile on my work machine and
On Thursday 12 July 2007, Ulf Ochsenfahrt wrote:
I'm currently using a statically compiled binary of monotone which
weights in at 40 MB. I wanted to get the huge db fix on my laptop, and
the easiest way was to do a static compile on my work machine and copy
over the library.
The i386 binary
Hi, monotone-devel. I'm following up after this was forwarded to the
boost developers list.
Zack Weinberg wrote:
For logistic reasons, we want to stop using all Boost libraries that
aren't header-only; I'll get into that below.
However, besides that, IMO boost::filesystem was always a poor
Hi, monotone-devel. I'm following up after this was forwarded to the
boost developers list.
Zack Weinberg wrote:
For logistic reasons, we want to stop using all Boost libraries that
aren't header-only; I'll get into that below.
However, besides that, IMO boost::filesystem was always a poor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zack Weinberg wrote:
Monotone no longer depends on boost::filesystem.
YAY for you!!!
boost::regex is now the only component of Boost that we use that
requires an external library for part of its code.
=)
Therefore I would recommend that we
10 matches
Mail list logo
