[Monotone-devel] Re: severe performance penalty for mtn log individual-file?

"Georg-W. Koltermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > is there a reason that "mtn log " has such a huge > performance penalty? It is a pain to use currently: > > + time mtn log > 4,93 real 4,15 user 0,16 sys > + time mtn log src/com/msc/sdm/application/SdmVersion

[Monotone-devel] Re: severe performance penalty for mtn log individual-file?

Bruce Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > I'm not sure. There's a note here > , and it's been > discussed on the list before. gives a plausible explanation. _

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: severe performance penalty for mtn log individual-file?

On Monday 10 July 2006 14:56, Bruce Stephens wrote: > The note on the wiki seems unconvincing since "mtn log" shows which > files have been changed in each revision. OK, there's the issue of > file renaming, but (intuitively) surely that can't be *that* costly to > compute, especially since rename