On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 03:47:01PM +1000, Robert Leftwich wrote:
> A simple:
>
> monotone: already up to date at 56ece60be1a574b54f7e130cd0caf60ed0811ef5
> BUT - unmerged heads exists
>
> would be sufficient.
And, thanks to Jeremy Cowgar, already implemented in 0.19 ;-).
(Similarly, 0
Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
My guess is that your code diverged at some point and you created two
different heads. Try 'monotone heads' and see if there is more than
one; if so, just run 'monotone merge' to merge them.
That was it, thanks.
I was sure I had run 'monotone head' when it first
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 22:51 +1000, Robert Leftwich wrote:
> I've been using monotone for a while on my personal projects without a
> problem.
> My setup is that I dual boot my laptop between linux (ubuntu) and xp, both of
> which run monotone 0.18. A w2000 box also runs monotone 0.18 using the
I've been using monotone for a while on my personal projects without a problem.
My setup is that I dual boot my laptop between linux (ubuntu) and xp, both of
which run monotone 0.18. A w2000 box also runs monotone 0.18 using the serve
option and acts as a central repository. My normal mode of o
