> "Matt" == Matt Lavin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matt> I'll try to clear up some of my statements.
Thank you, appreciated!
Matt> 1. ... For the tailor.py build project I had a couple of
Matt> extra empty directories and 1 missing file. One thing I
Matt> noticed about the
I hope I didn't appear to be slamming tailor.py, I was trying mostly to
compliment cvssync. I'll try to clear up some of my statements.
1. "correct file generation" should have been "correct directory
contents". I have a rather large project that I was trying to convert (
~3500 patches) and
> "Matt" == Matt Lavin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matt> If you are targeting monotone as the new SCM then cvssync is
Matt> heads above tailor.py in terms of speed and correct file
Matt> generation.
No doubt on former, given the different overall goals of the two,
but I'd like to
Let me start by saying that the cvssync branch is the best CVS history
preserving converter I have used. If you are targeting monotone as the
new SCM then cvssync is heads above tailor.py in terms of speed and
correct file generation. I got exactly what I wanted from the cvssync
branch in alm
