Re: [Monotone-devel] ding dong, boost::filesystem is dead

2007-07-12 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 02:40:54PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote: > I anticipated this objection, and made the configure script pick up an > external libpcre if available. The tarball still contains the source > code though. We used to do this with I think Lua, and it just ended up meaning that ther

Re: [Monotone-devel] ding dong, boost::filesystem is dead

2007-07-12 Thread Zack Weinberg
On 7/12/07, Richard Levitte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:15:58 -0700, "Zack Weinberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: zackw> I am entirely in agreement with you. :-) In fact, the zackw> nvm.experiment.pcre branch does just that - replaces zackw> bo

Re: [Monotone-devel] ding dong, boost::filesystem is dead

2007-07-12 Thread Zack Weinberg
On 7/12/07, Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Zack Weinberg writes: > I am entirely in agreement with you. :-) In fact, the > nvm.experiment.pcre branch does just that - replaces boost::regex > with libpcre, which is much smaller and can sanely be bundled with > monotone. This is why I a

Re: [Monotone-devel] ding dong, boost::filesystem is dead

2007-07-12 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Zack Weinberg writes: > I am entirely in agreement with you. :-) In fact, the > nvm.experiment.pcre branch does just that - replaces boost::regex > with libpcre, which is much smaller and can sanely be bundled with > monotone. This is why I am suggesting landing both the .deregexp > and the .pcre

Re: [Monotone-devel] ding dong, boost::filesystem is dead

2007-07-12 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:15:58 -0700, "Zack Weinberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: zackw> I am entirely in agreement with you. :-) In fact, the zackw> nvm.experiment.pcre branch does just that - replaces zackw> boost::regex with libpcre, which is much smaller and can sa

Re: [Monotone-devel] ding dong, boost::filesystem is dead

2007-07-12 Thread Zack Weinberg
On 7/11/07, Richard Levitte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:53:47 -0700, "Zack Weinberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: zackw> boost::regex is now the only component of Boost that we use zackw> that requires an external library for part of its code.

RE: [Monotone-devel] ding dong, boost::filesystem is dead

2007-07-12 Thread Kelly F. Hickel
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Richard Levitte > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 12:28 AM > To: monotone-devel@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] ding dong, boost::filesystem is dead > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:53:47

Re: [Monotone-devel] ding dong, boost::filesystem is dead

2007-07-11 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:53:47 -0700, "Zack Weinberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: zackw> boost::regex is now the only component of Boost that we use zackw> that requires an external library for part of its code. I'd zackw> like to reopen the discussion on what we shoul

[Monotone-devel] ding dong, boost::filesystem is dead

2007-07-11 Thread Zack Weinberg
As of revision 9546b6ea3c29b0a8f63542f6d495efd33bec9add, Monotone no longer depends on boost::filesystem. (Technically, rev 285185cc395c0a643d531104b6b30cb3455d9d6e removed the dependency; the subsequent change removes a use of boost::algorithm::join, which is apparently a 1.34ism.) This means w