Zack Weinberg wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Ulf Ochsenfahrt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
By the way, why does the new monotone-viz package only have a recommends for
monotone? monotone-viz does use the automate interface. Left-over from an
earlier version?
As far as I know, it can read
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Ulf Ochsenfahrt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, why does the new monotone-viz package only have a recommends for
> monotone? monotone-viz does use the automate interface. Left-over from an
> earlier version?
As far as I know, it can read a monotone databas
Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Ulf Ochsenfahrt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi everyone!
The old monotone-viz package (which was 0.15 still) didn't work with
my new monotone package (0.41), so I've uploaded new monotone-viz
packages to my personal package area:
https://launchpad.net/~ulf-ofahrt/+archiv
Ulf Ochsenfahrt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi everyone!
>
> The old monotone-viz package (which was 0.15 still) didn't work with
> my new monotone package (0.41), so I've uploaded new monotone-viz
> packages to my personal package area:
>
> https://launchpad.net/~ulf-ofahrt/+archive
Why did yo
Hi everyone!
The old monotone-viz package (which was 0.15 still) didn't work with my
new monotone package (0.41), so I've uploaded new monotone-viz packages
to my personal package area:
https://launchpad.net/~ulf-ofahrt/+archive
Cheers,
-- Ulf
PS: Should I add a conflict to the monotone pa
