Re: Outstanding Branches

2009-09-03 Thread Sam Vilain
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 23:50 -0400, Chris Prather wrote: Okay since I started beating people about the head and shoulders that we're an open process (http://chris.prather.org/perl/take-arms-against-a-sea-of-troubles/) what do we need to get the current outstanding branches in Moose.git (and

Towards a New Moose Website

2009-09-03 Thread Stevan Little
So, when next I have a dose of free time (which hopefully will be later this month) I want to revise the Moose website. As Gabor pointed out (http://szabgab.com/blog/2009/08/1251583673.html), what is there now is not very organized and difficult to wade through. As Moose gets more popular

Re: Towards a New Moose Website

2009-09-03 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Stevan Little wrote: I am not looking for sponsorship, endorsement or anything official, just like to be able to point out to people who ask (like this guy on perlmonks - http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=793076). Here is a short list of companies I already know

Re: Towards a New Moose Website

2009-09-03 Thread Stevan Little
On Sep 3, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote: On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Stevan Little wrote: I am not looking for sponsorship, endorsement or anything official, just like to be able to point out to people who ask (like this guy on perlmonks - http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=793076).

Re: Towards a New Moose Website

2009-09-03 Thread Jarrod Overson
We're using moose at Napster to rewrite a bit of our backend, and I'm pushing for it elsewhere. In fact, today we just rolled out the list of dependencies and the latest moose version to our frontend so (after a year) I'm finally getting somewhere. On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Dave

Re: Towards a New Moose Website

2009-09-03 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Stevan Little wrote: On Sep 3, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote: On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Stevan Little wrote: I am not looking for sponsorship, endorsement or anything official, just like to be able to point out to people who ask (like this guy on perlmonks -

Specifying exact type

2009-09-03 Thread Yuri Shtil
If I say isa = 'Class', then it will include all derived classes. How do I exclude derived classes? Do I need a subtype like: subtype TopClassOnly = as 'Class' = where {blessed($_) eq 'Class'}; -- Yuri

Re: Specifying exact type

2009-09-03 Thread Jesse Luehrs
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 01:33:58PM -0700, Yuri Shtil wrote: If I say isa = 'Class', then it will include all derived classes. How do I exclude derived classes? Do I need a subtype like: subtype TopClassOnly = as 'Class' = where {blessed($_) eq 'Class'}; First of all, don't do that, and

Re: Towards a New Moose Website

2009-09-03 Thread Chris Prather
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Stevan Littlestevan.lit...@iinteractive.com wrote: So, when next I have a dose of free time (which hopefully will be later this month) I want to revise the Moose website. As Gabor pointed out (http://szabgab.com/blog/2009/08/1251583673.html), what is there now is

Re: Towards a New Moose Website

2009-09-03 Thread Stevan Little
On Sep 3, 2009, at 5:04 PM, Chris Prather wrote: On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Stevan Littlestevan.lit...@iinteractive.com wrote: So, when next I have a dose of free time (which hopefully will be later this month) I want to revise the Moose website. As Gabor pointed out

Fwd: Specifying exact type

2009-09-03 Thread Chris Prather
I missed the list ... why doesn't google to reply to all anymore? *sigh* -- Forwarded message -- From: Chris Prather perig...@gmail.com Date: Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:10 PM Subject: Re: Specifying exact type To: Jesse Luehrs d...@tozt.net On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Jesse

Re: Fwd: Specifying exact type

2009-09-03 Thread Hans Dieter Pearcey
Excerpts from Yuri Shtil's message of Thu Sep 03 19:08:17 -0400 2009: What is wrong in excluding some of the derived classes from a subtype definition? Like Chris said: One of the main points to object orientation is Subtype Polymorphism ... meaning derived classes can be substituted for

subtyping parameterized types

2009-09-03 Thread Hans Dieter Pearcey
subtype Foo, as ArrayRef[Str], where { @$_ 5 }; Foo is now a parameteriz*able* type, not a parameteriz*ed* type; that is, in theory (if the MooseX::Types decorators allow it), you can: has foo_classes = (isa = Foo[ClassName]); since ClassName is a subtype of Str. This surprised me, and

Re: subtyping parameterized types

2009-09-03 Thread Hans Dieter Pearcey
Excerpts from Hans Dieter Pearcey's message of Thu Sep 03 20:52:02 -0400 2009: subtype Foo, as ArrayRef[Str], where { @$_ 5 }; Foo is now a parameteriz*able* type, not a parameteriz*ed* type; that is, in theory (if the MooseX::Types decorators allow it), you can: has foo_classes =