Excerpts from Karen Etheridge's message of Thu Jan 14 20:03:11 -0500 2010:
> Does anyone have any opinions on MooseX::NaturalKey? Is anyone else using
> it? Is it stable?
I think it had gone a bit stale (0.02 had 94 passes and 270+ fails), but
mugwump just updated it in December (to match changes
Does anyone have any opinions on MooseX::NaturalKey? Is anyone else using
it? Is it stable?
I'm considering using it in a production environment in combination with
MooseX::Role::Parameterized; all opinions/feedback/alternative suggestions
are welcome.
--
"He who knows he has eno
Hi Stevan,
Would you be kind to review v0.04 at
http://search.cpan.org/~karasik/MooseX-Lists-0.04/ ?
I think I incorporated all your notes.
--
Sincerely,
Dmitry Karasik
> Well, not overloading "isa" would bring you closer to the main
> ideology of Moose. Changing these to meta-attribute traits would also
> help as we tend to discourage adding more "keywords". And lastly
> supporting the items I mentioned in the previous email would help as
> well. Most Moo
