Excerpts from Stevan Little's message of Thu Aug 13 05:45:04 -0700 2009:
Not sure if this will conflict that much as Jesse is talking about
arguments to the -import methods not regular constructor args.
You're wrong, but in a trivial way; he's talking about parameters to with().
with
Chris,
Not sure if this will conflict that much as Jesse is talking about
arguments to the -import methods not regular constructor args.
Jesse, correct me if I am wrong here.
- Stevan
On Aug 13, 2009, at 8:26 AM, Chris Fields wrote:
On Aug 12, 2009, at 9:06 PM, Hans Dieter Pearcey wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 08:45:04AM -0400, Stevan Little wrote:
Chris,
Not sure if this will conflict that much as Jesse is talking about
arguments to the -import methods not regular constructor args.
Jesse, correct me if I am wrong here.
- Stevan
Yeah, Moose doesn't do anything special
This sounds sane to me. Consistency is always a good thing.
- Stevan
On Aug 12, 2009, at 8:02 PM, Jesse Luehrs wrote:
To line up better with other places in Moose where we accept optional
parameters (-metaclass, etc), and for better compatibility with other
modules which might add additional
