Re: [Moo] Forging SVG support. Anyone interested?

It's canvas, not SVG, but is the NodeGraphJSforge plugin close to what you're trying to achieve? On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 12:07:53 AM UTC-7, Tor wrote: > > Thanks Erik! > > I'm going to use a MooTools approach and won't be using a library with a > di

[Moo] Re: Forging SVG support. Anyone interested?

Hi Tor, I created some MooTools SVG classes for a charts plugin for VM UI Framework that you might find helpful. Here's a gist of the SVG class, the charts code

[Moo] Re: Anyone want to help test a MooTools-powered responsive UI framework?

n retina screens. - Fixed tooltips to work on mobile. On Thursday, March 7, 2013 11:29:12 AM UTC-8, Benjamin Kuker wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've created a Mootools-based UI framework, called VM UI Framework and I'm > looking for beta testers. Here's a quick rundown: > >

[Moo] Re: First attempt at a MooTools website redesign. Thoughts?

w site. On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:28:57 PM UTC-7, Benjamin Kuker wrote: > > As a result of a conversation in another thread about helping jumpstart > the MooTools community and development, I thought I would try my hand at > refreshing the look of the website. A couple things befo

[Moo] Re: First attempt at a MooTools website redesign. Thoughts?

standing the new prime mechanism with the > commonjs methods to help in this project and hopefully to be a key > developer one day. > > Kudos for your amazing work - well done ! > > On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:28:57 PM UTC+2, Benjamin Kuker wrote: >> >> As a re

Re: [Moo] Re: First attempt at a MooTools website redesign. Thoughts?

ny colors just yet :) > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Benjamin Kuker > > > wrote: > >> Sounds good. Perhaps in a week or two, once things get finalized a bit >> more, we could chat about some of the specifics. >> >> >> On Saturday, March 23,

Re: [Moo] Re: First attempt at a MooTools website redesign. Thoughts?

nodester which I can't seem to boot up at the moment due to noderster's > crashing >_<. > > Just coming back to mootools after taking some time to learn JavaScript > better :) > and would really love to see moo get it's fair share in the community so I >

[Moo] Re: First attempt at a MooTools website redesign. Thoughts?

n Saturday, March 23, 2013 8:44:56 AM UTC-4, Benjamin Kuker wrote: >> >> Okay, so I did some revisions based on everyone's feedback and placed >> them on the redesign >> wiki<https://github.com/mootools/website/wiki/Ideas-Benjamin>. >> I also tried to incorporat

[Moo] Re: First attempt at a MooTools website redesign. Thoughts?

n Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:28:57 PM UTC-7, Benjamin Kuker wrote: > > As a result of a conversation in another thread about helping jumpstart > the MooTools community and development, I thought I would try my hand at > refreshing the look of the website. A couple things before I sh

[Moo] Re: First attempt at a MooTools website redesign. Thoughts?

So after some chats on IRC, it looks like there will also eventually be some micro-sites: Prime, Elements, Slick, and Agent. Something to keep in mind for the design. On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:28:57 PM UTC-7, Benjamin Kuker wrote: > > As a result of a conversation in another thread

Re: [Moo] Re: First attempt at a MooTools website redesign. Thoughts?

ke the fame and the community behind Bootstrap. I think if one of > the basic ideas of the redesign is to promote, using Bootstrap will make > people realize that you can still use the Mootools library with Bootstrap. > Again > this is not to make enemies if not allies, to use force of c

Re: [Moo] Re: First attempt at a MooTools website redesign. Thoughts?

eturns" > (although I can make that inference when I see "Examples" and "Class > example" right next to each other). > > On 21/03/13 07:32, Benjamin Kuker wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback, everyone, I'm glad you like the general > direction. A

Re: [Moo] Re: First attempt at a MooTools website redesign. Thoughts?

presence vibrant. This can be simple stuff - > answering questions on message boards, explaining & linking to the > documentation, providing alternative MooTools solutions to jQuery ones etc. > Doing a little bit each person, and as a group, building a stronger > community. > &

[Moo] Re: First attempt at a MooTools website redesign. Thoughts?

Thanks for the feedback, everyone, I'm glad you like the general direction. A couple follow-up questions before I update the mocks: - My original intention was for the download button to just link to the download page, where you could customize your build and download older versions as

[Moo] First attempt at a MooTools website redesign. Thoughts?

As a result of a conversation in another thread about helping jumpstart the MooTools community and development, I thought I would try my hand at refreshing the look of the website. A couple things before I share the links to the mockups, though. 1. The look of the current website isn't bad.

Re: [Moo] Re: Now that Joomla (3.0) has almost given up on Mootools, what will become of it ?

Quite agreed. See my response to Aaron. I think maybe opening up to the community might be a good idea. On Thursday, March 14, 2013 12:34:57 PM UTC-7, Tor wrote: > > I myself have never been worried about perhaps choosing the wrong > framework because I chose the one I found easier and the one t

Re: [Moo] Re: Now that Joomla (3.0) has almost given up on Mootools, what will become of it ?

Having just written a fairly large open source UI framework in MooTools (see a few threads down), this is a topic I have a lot of interest in. I've been using MooTools for 5+ years and use it in most of my projects. I've used jQuery when I've had to, but it's definitely not my preference. Commu

[Moo] Re: Anyone want to help test a MooTools-powered responsive UI framework?

Awesome, thanks! I'll be pushing out the next version with fixes later this week. On Monday, March 11, 2013 10:42:47 AM UTC-7, pixel67 wrote: > > I signed up :) > > On Sunday, March 10, 2013 1:32:03 PM UTC-4, Benjamin Kuker wrote: >> >> Thanks, adidi, I appreci

[Moo] Re: Anyone want to help test a MooTools-powered responsive UI framework?

Thanks, adidi, I appreciate you saying that. On Sunday, March 10, 2013 4:46:38 AM UTC-7, adidi wrote: > > Looks amazing ! nice work - really nifty > > On Thursday, March 7, 2013 9:29:12 PM UTC+2, Benjamin Kuker wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I've created a

Re: [Moo] Anyone want to help test a MooTools-powered responsive UI framework?

Good point. I'll do that on the next update. On Friday, March 8, 2013 2:19:47 PM UTC-8, Sanford Whiteman wrote: > > I was about to report some 404s as well -- Benjamin, maybe you should fade > out those "pending" links. > > -- S. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: [Moo] Anyone want to help test a MooTools-powered responsive UI framework?

g on a commercial drag-and-drop >> editor for the framework. The editor won't be required to use the >> framework, but hopefully it will be a huge time-saver. >> >> I have a temporary demo of the framework online at >> http://vm.uiframework.com. It's also on Git