Re: [MOPO] Bonham's - Absentee Bidders Treated Unfairly?

2005-12-06 Thread Rudy Franchi
Better auctioneers usual say "Lot's of interest here," which means you should get ready to stick one hand higher in the air and the other deeper in your pocket. Regards, rudy franchi Thanks Marty, Bob and everyone else for their explanations. They do make sense; I agree it's a waste of time t

Re: [MOPO] Bonham's - Absentee Bidders Treated Unfairly?

2005-12-06 Thread David Kusumoto
Thanks Marty, Bob and everyone else for their explanations. They do make sense; I agree it's a waste of time to hear climbing bidding increments if the house already has two competing absentee bids which are higher than an opening bid closer to the low end of a catalog estimate. I just wish auct

Re: [MOPO] Bonham's - Absentee Bidders Treated Unfairly?

2005-12-06 Thread OneSheet
David:Bob is exactly correct as to why the bidding increments jump like that on occasion.  I believe, all auction houses execute absentee bids the same way.  If a poster has an estimate of $700 to $900, but there are absentee bids of $2500 and $4000, the auctioneer will open the bidding with a

[MOPO] Fw: [MOPO] Bonham's - Absentee Bidders Treated Unfairly?

2005-12-06 Thread Walter Reuben
y, December 05, 2005 9:59 PM Subject: [MOPO] Bonham's - Absentee Bidders Treated Unfairly? Hello all -- Just one thing bothered me. If you were there, maybe you can explain. ** For some posters, bidding JUMPED immediately (w/no declared bidding increments in between) -- to the HIGHEST level es

Re: [MOPO] Bonham's - Absentee Bidders Treated Unfairly?

2005-12-06 Thread lobby card invasion
ecember 06, 2005 1:12 AM Subject: Re: [MOPO] Bonham's - Absentee Bidders Treated Unfairly? > Bob - > > Now THAT makes sense. I hope this is true with all auction houses because > I've long been suspicious of such "huge bidding leaps" on the floor, with no > incr

Re: [MOPO] Bonham's - Absentee Bidders Treated Unfairly?

2005-12-06 Thread lobby card invasion
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 1:58 AM Subject: Re: [MOPO] Bonham's - Absentee Bidders Treated Unfairly? Although this practice seems psychologically "wrong" to us in the age of internet auctions, it is actually quite common and accepted in the old

Re: [MOPO] Bonham's - Absentee Bidders Treated Unfairly?

2005-12-06 Thread Kirby McDaniel
I bid on the phone and I had no problems. Bidding on the phone is always the best option, because then you know what you did, what they did etc. A good auction, I thought. Kirby McDaniel www.movieart.net On Dec 5, 2005, at 11:59 PM, David Kusumoto wrote: Hello all -- Just one thing bothere

Re: [MOPO] Bonham's - Absentee Bidders Treated Unfairly?

2005-12-05 Thread JR
bably explains why it only happens sometimes -- at other times the amount is specified to be a "hidden maximum" and so is bid in increments as one would normally expect.   -- JR   - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

Re: [MOPO] Bonham's - Absentee Bidders Treated Unfairly?

2005-12-05 Thread David Kusumoto
Bob - Now THAT makes sense. I hope this is true with all auction houses because I've long been suspicious of such "huge bidding leaps" on the floor, with no increments accepted in between. ** If auctioneers simply added one line -- "we have two competing absentee bids that begin with $2500," we

Re: [MOPO] Bonham's - Absentee Bidders Treated Unfairly?

2005-12-05 Thread bob
then starts taking floor bids (that get immediately outbid by the second absentee bidder)... Cheers, Bob - Original Message - From: "David Kusumoto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 9:59 PM Subject: [MOPO] Bonham's - Absentee Bidders Trea

[MOPO] Bonham's - Absentee Bidders Treated Unfairly?

2005-12-05 Thread David Kusumoto
Hello all -- Just one thing bothered me. If you were there, maybe you can explain. ** For some posters, bidding JUMPED immediately (w/no declared bidding increments in between) -- to the HIGHEST level established by an absentee bidder. Not all the time, but it happened. ** For example, I was