I say Craig should send you one and let you test it and you can
compare your results to your other results
At 03:45 PM 8/20/2011, Todd Spoor wrote:
Craig, we are NOT saying there aren't real rolled 1 sheets of the
Thing or any other poster out there, we are saying someone is using
a very high
Todd:
I guess it was the phrase "compared side by side to the real deal
and was perfect EXCEPT that it was rolled" that made me jump to
the conclusion that you were saying real ones aren't rolled.
Craig.
At 03:45 PM 8/20/2011, Todd Spoor wrote:
Craig, we are NOT saying there aren't real rolled
Craig, we are NOT saying there aren't real rolled 1 sheets of the Thing or any
other poster out there, we are saying someone is using a very high level
printing technology to make these knock offs using "newer" paper which possess
a high level of alkaline compared to earlier paper.
Sent from my
l Message
>From: cr...@wolfmill.com
>To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
>Subject: Re: [MOPO] Dave Dave Dave
>Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 14:44:13 -0700
>
>>At 01:15 PM 8/20/2011, Richard Halegua Posters + Comic Art wrote:
>>>>eeing the fake rolled 1 sheet for the Kurt Russell
I see no reason why it shouldn't. I would be willing to test it out if have
some you want to send us.
Thanks
Todd
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 20, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Bruce Hershenson wrote:
> Todd, does your method work equally well on stills? There are tons of
> "re-strikes" that constantly fool
Po List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of Richard
> Halegua Comic Art
> Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 4:20 PM
> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Dave Dave Dave
>
> But Todd
>
> the guy who showed you the Thing poster at Cinevent
At 01:15 PM 8/20/2011, Richard Halegua Posters + Comic Art wrote:
eeing the fake rolled 1 sheet for the Kurt Russell the THING which
was compared side by side to the real deal and was perfect EXCEPT
that it was rolled, and when we forensically tested it, PROVED it
was produced in the late 1980'
MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of Richard
Halegua Comic Art
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 4:20 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Dave Dave Dave
But Todd
the guy who showed you the Thing poster at Cinevent said you did the
testing right there, unless I mis
Yes you misunderstood, we LOOKED at the poster at Cinevent, but took it with us
because we had to lift a sample from the poster to send into the lab.
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 20, 2011, at 2:19 PM, Richard Halegua Comic Art
wrote:
> But Todd
>
> the guy who showed you the Thing poster at Cine
But Todd
the guy who showed you the Thing poster at Cinevent said you did the
testing right there, unless I misunderstood him
At 02:00 PM 8/20/2011, Todd Spoor wrote:
Although I did sleep at a holiday in last night, I am NOT forensic
scientist. The Forensic company we are using does crimina
Although I did sleep at a holiday in last night, I am NOT forensic scientist.
The Forensic company we are using does criminal cases throughout the US and
they are quite certain of their findings. If you look at the presentation they
state the Paper Mills in the US switched over to a "Alkaline we
Todd, does your method work equally well on stills? There are tons of
"re-strikes" that constantly fool "the experts".
Bruce
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Todd Spoor wrote:
> Rich, the exact same test that was done one "The Thing" can be viewed on
> our website on the right side of the scree
"Cinevent Presentation." it shows quite conclusively the different
paper used and especially the different alkaline/ PH in the paper
proving it was made in different time periods.
Todd
couldn't the variances also be due to being stored in different locales?
for instance, what is the alkaline
Rich, the exact same test that was done one "The Thing" can be viewed on our
website on the right side of the screen under, "Cinevent Presentation." it
shows quite conclusively the different paper used and especially the different
alkaline/ PH in the paper proving it was made in different time p
eeing the fake rolled 1 sheet for the Kurt Russell the THING which
was compared side by side to the real deal and was perfect EXCEPT
that it was rolled, and when we forensically tested it, PROVED it
was produced in the late 1980's, would make me question any rolled
one sheet. This fake was TH
om writes:
> I agree there were many ROLLED posters I had 1920a rolled posters
> .. it seemed that the norm was folded esp national screen.. however
> printers and studios did seem to send out some rolled.
> so its possible to get certain titles rolled IMHO
> >
> >
> >----
l Message
>From: sa...@comic-art.com
>To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
>Subject: Re: [MOPO] Dave Dave Dave
>Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:19:03 -0700
>
>>Rick
>>
>>I have a number of rolled never folded posters, including some from
>>1936, 1940 & on
ad 1920a rolled posters
.. it seemed that the norm was folded esp national screen.. however
printers and studios did seem to send out some rolled.
so its possible to get certain titles rolled IMHO
>
>
> Original Message
>From: sa...@comic-art.com
>To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AME
omic-art.com
>To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
>Subject: Re: [MOPO] Dave Dave Dave
>Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:19:03 -0700
>
>>Rick
>>
>>I have a number of rolled never folded posters, including some from
>>1936, 1940 & on to 1960s in my current auction
&g
Rick
I have a number of rolled never folded posters, including some from
1936, 1940 & on to 1960s in my current auction
they are all definitely authentic theatrical posters
It is true that the enormous majority of posters prior to the rolled
era are folded, but there are posters that were nev
Now *THIS *is "beating a dead horse"!
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:17 PM, David Lieberman wrote:
> **
> again, fished out of my spam folder.
>
> because there has never been a reason to send one to Todd. And he has only
> been authenticating for what? less than a year now? I've had them for over 5
again, fished out of my spam folder.
because there has never been a reason to send one to Todd. And he has only
been authenticating for what? less than a year now? I've had them for over
5 years.
No one has ever doubted themonly youand again you have
never even touched one
Hi, Dave,
Was wondering...have you sent even one of these somewhat questionable
one sheets to Todd Spoor for checking its (their) true verifiable
authenticity..even one? If you haven't, why haven't you? If the results came
back
that the alleged one sheets were authentic, I'd offer you
23 matches
Mail list logo
