this will be my last post about this, and again, I apologize to mopo for
having to put up with this ridiculous matter.
bobby dear!!
you can spin it however you'd like.
the thread does speak for itself. I did not misunderstand itit is plain
as day. So basically, you admit now y
Jeff, I hate to admit but it was.
Now, isn't there a limit on postings on MoPo?
Shouldn't there be a limit on BORING bickering posts on MoPo?
THIS DOES NOT INTEREST ANYONE BUT CLEARLY YOU'RE BOTH TRYING
TO BE 'RIGHT' AND 'WIN' RATHER THAN BEING SMART.
sh, take it private
I beseech the
AOL EmailPreparation H is supposed to be good for planetoids, isn't it?
Have a good weekend, all!
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Bob Brooks
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] E.T. Bicycle 1sh. "faux c
this sounds a LOT more interestingLOL
jeff
On Nov 6, 2008, at 1:01 PM, Patrick Michael Tupy wrote:
Yeah, I feel this is like one of my undercover vice stakeouts when
we were eavesdropping on
George Michael and Ernest Borgnine at night in the park.
Visit the MoPo Mailing List
he last word is Dave's...
Cheers,
Bob
- Original Message -
From: David Lieberman
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] E.T. Bicycle 1sh. "faux controversy."
bob bob bob..nice backpeddling.
Yeah, I feel this is like one of my undercover vice stakeouts when we
were eavesdropping on
George Michael and Ernest Borgnine at night in the park.
I'll tell you guys what I told them...
"This is boring, guys. Your choice, take it private or get a room!"
Patrick
On Nov 6, 2008, at 12:3
bob bob bob..nice backpeddling.
what you said was crystal clear.you said there were 27x41 originals. You
also referred to the ones everyone considers originals as bootlegs or second
printings.
And you (or dan) seemed to have the evidence to back it up.
if you want to chan
You two are getting very boring. What's the deal here? A lover's tiff?
Op 6 nov 2008, om 21:21 heeft David Lieberman het volgende geschreven:
these are YOUR exact words bob:
So, here's the list of things that are different between the
originals and these possible-bootlegs (I'm going to call t
oesn't mean that what you're saying is true...
- Original Message -
From: David Lieberman
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] E.T. Bicycle 1sh. "faux controversy."
these are YOUR exact words
these are YOUR exact words bob:
So, here's the list of things that are different between the originals and
these possible-bootlegs (I'm going to call the ones we know to be original
"originals" and the ones that are widely available "bootlegs" - I'm going to
ignore the reprints for
AOL EmailDidn't actually READ that thread, did you Dave?...
- Original Message -
From: David Lieberman
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 12:05 PM
Subject: [MOPO] E.T. Bicycle 1sh. "faux controversy."
short memor
short memory there huh bob?
_http://stylec.yuku.com/topic/3447_ (http://stylec.yuku.com/topic/3447)
David Lieberman
_CineMasterpieces.com_ (http://www.cinemasterpieces.com/) | 15721 N.
Greenway Hayden Loop, Suite 105 -- Scottsdale, Az 85260
Vintage Original Movie Poste
: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 5:50 PM
Subject: [MOPO] E.T. Bicycle 1sh. "faux controversy."
** Hey Dave Lieberman of Scottsdale -- on the contrary -- when it comes to
Dan Rickard and Bob Brooks -- while initially skeptical of their analysis of
some titles, particularly minty
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 19:43:03 -0800From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [MOPO] E.T.
Bicycle 1sh. "faux controversy."To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
There you go again, Lieberman -- trying to get ME -- to slam Rickard's hard
work. First you say you got your info from Dan and Bob direct -- now
what?
are you two going to get naked together?
it's BEAR with me, as in bear the burden.
ha ha.
K.
On Nov 5, 2008, at 8:09 PM, David Lieberman wrote:
davidcalm down.
the two crazies up in canada DID actually claim they had an original
that measured a full 27" x 41".I'm not makin
Thanks, my Surname is Richards, but Gold will do.
http://stylec.yuku.com/topic/3447
I assume this is the thread of which you speak?
Ari
--- On Thu, 6/11/08, David Lieberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: David Lieberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [MOPO] E.T. Bicycl
There you go again, Lieberman -- trying to get ME -- to slam Rickard's hard
work. First you say you got your info from Dan and Bob direct -- now you say
you got it second hand from a "lively discussion" at another blog/forum. Which
is it? It does matter, blog vs. direct. You hate being ques
sometimes crazy people say sane things.
so tell me Ari Gold...do YOU think they are full of shit? Don't pretend
like you don't remember the thread where this was discussed. It was a pretty
lively discussion.
David Lieberman
_CineMasterpieces.com_ (http://www.cinemasterp
id Kusumoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] E.T. Bicycle 1sh. "faux controversy."
> To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
> Received: Thursday, 6 November, 2008, 1:50 PM
> No, I don't think Rickard or Brooks are full of shit.
> ESPECIALLY because you're onl
jeezsomeone needs to take a pill.
davidI answered your question...26 3/4" x 40 1/2".
please email both of them and ask them yourself if you don't believe me. (if
they don't respond here).
the message board where this was brought up was either nsfge or movie poster
foru
No, I don't think Rickard or Brooks are full of shit. ESPECIALLY because
you're only going on vague "memory" of what you say they wrote -- vs. hard
journaling by yourself.
So now I'm asking you.what were the measurements of the E.T. bike poster
consigned to you by the woman from ILM?
davidcalm down.
the two crazies up in canada DID actually claim they had an original that
measured a full 27" x 41".I'm not making this up..the evidence
they provided on the message boards some time ago actually seemed
plausible...from what I remember, they h
** Hey Dave Lieberman of Scottsdale -- on the contrary -- when it comes to Dan
Rickard and Bob Brooks -- while initially skeptical of their analysis of some
titles, particularly minty white inserts -- I was turned around 100% after
their investigation turned up other major discoveries, particul
23 matches
Mail list logo
