countries after the war. I've seen many examples of the Casablanca lobbies
discovered overseas having this clause in the lower right border.
Hope that helps.
Ron MooreCinema Icons
--- On Thu, 12/10/09, Phil Edwards wrote:
From: Phil Edwards
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Linen vs. regular lobby cards
To
Hi Steve,
These were definitely 11x14...I had the entire set from THE WEDDING MARCH
(1928) and they were linen cards.
Todd
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:24:23 -0600
From: stand...@ll.net
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Linen vs. regular lobby cards
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Yes, Todd, I
it is linen-stock.
Steve
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:53:13 -0500
From: toddfeier...@msn.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Linen vs. regular lobby cards
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Hi Rick,
Just for your info, there were other studios that used linen paper. One that
comes to mind was Paramou
From: rgv1...@live.com
To: brucehershen...@gmail.com; mopo-l@listserv.american.edu
Subject: RE: [MOPO] Linen vs. regular lobby cards
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:01:01 -0600
Thanks for all the input on the "linen/flat Warner paper controversy".It
seems like what Bruce and Grey
xpost...@aol.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Linen vs. regular lobby cards
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Warner Brothers linen lobby paper stock (I believe used by Warners between
1937 and 1942--the last title I'm aware of being Yankee Doodle Dandy)--is very
tricky because as soon as you think y
Does anyone know of a studio log/record of dates that titles were released,
and subsequently re-released in American theaters?
For example: Angels with dirty faces was released in 1938, and is known to
be re-released nation-wide in 1948 and 1956.
It seems that our answers would lie in a datab
t; The paper from that period is exceedingly rare due to the later war paper
> drives, but also most significantly, due to the fragile nature of the paper
> stock. The linen paper is infamous for tanning and becoming brittle if not
> stored in a stable environment. When folded, the ins
almost always began to
separate.
From: MoPo List [mailto:mop...@listserv.american.edu] On Behalf Of
rixpost...@aol.com
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 5:10 AM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Linen vs. regular lobby cards
Warner Brothers linen lobby paper stock (I believe
This is almost 100% correct, but not quite. The correction is that the
seeming "exceptions" are not exceptions at all (where the originals are
non-linen, and the re-releases are linen).
These solely occur in the rare cases where a pre-1937 title was re-released
during the 1937 to early 1942 period
Warner Brothers linen lobby paper stock (I believe used by Warners between
1937 and 1942--the last title I'm aware of being Yankee Doodle Dandy)--is
very tricky because as soon as you think you have it all figured
out--you're thrown a curve ball. Usually, as in the case of Angels With Dir
All markings on the card are identical to the Linen stock cards, with no
dating in the copyright info
That was my experience when I had the ERLICH cards side by side.
I've seen re-release cards for ROBIN HOOD (Flynn) that were on flat stock
that looked exactly like their earlier
11 matches
Mail list logo
