;.
>
> This tear possibly looks butt ugly as the tape might be showing through
> from the front.
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On *Mon, 7/3/11, David Kusumoto * wrote:
>
>
> From: David Kusumoto
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] REVISED WITH LIVE LINK: GILDA is Back - Dumped bidder /
>
usumoto
Subject: Re: [MOPO] REVISED WITH LIVE LINK: GILDA is Back - Dumped bidder /
fall-through sale?
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Date: Monday, 7 March, 2011, 4:53
Nothing nefarious being suggested here, because it's apparent that Nate's
Autographs has a higher clientele - bu
Check that. The Gilda style B that Bruce sold last summer was near pristine
w/only fold-line restoration; (un-retouched archived photo below). Nate's
example by comparison has fading issues.
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 20:53:54 -0800
From: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: REVISED WITH LIV
Nothing nefarious being suggested here, because it's apparent that Nate's
Autographs has a higher clientele - but I always find it interesting to see how
two sellers present the exact same pricey item to the auction market. We're
talking big dollars here and the only thing I can think of is
a couple weeks ago I did a BIN with Rick Ryan for a Revenge of the
Creature card at $35
paid right away as I usually do and later that day Rick emailed me
that his wife did the listing and I got lucky because she wasn't
supposed to add a BIN to the listing. Of course, Rick wasn't asking
me to w
Yep, perhaps seller had second thoughts when he remembered he paid 21k
for it a few weeks ago.
On 7 Mar 2011, at 01:56, David Kusumoto wrote:
REVISED WITH LIVE LINK.
There's something strange going on with that sale. Last week, the
seller "apparently" accepted a "best offer" for $17,500.
REVISED WITH LIVE LINK.
There's something strange going on with that sale. Last week, the seller
"apparently" accepted a "best offer" for $17,500. That offer WAS accepted.
Either the buyer got cold feet or the seller had second thoughts. At any rate,
that sale (original link belo
7 matches
Mail list logo
