That would be my first guess as well. I'm not the expert for 1930s
posters, but I find it most unlikely that any printer would use one
litho number for two different posters, even if they are from the
same title.
Helmut
Am 21.09.2009 um 18:32 schrieb David Lieberman:
perhaps that area wa
or maybe this is another one that "is expertly restored" and has the
"appearance of being in fine condition"
Op 21 sep 2009, om 18:32 heeft David Lieberman het volgende geschreven:
perhaps that area was missing/damaged and the restorer wrote in the
wrong number.
David Lieberman
Cine
perhaps that area was missing/damaged and the restorer wrote in the wrong
number.
David Lieberman
_CineMasterpieces.com_ (http://www.cinemasterpieces.com/) | 15721 N.
Greenway Hayden Loop, Suite 105 -- Scottsdale, Az 85260
Vintage Original Movie Posters | 602 309 0500 | O
Okay;
While we're all bickering about Heritage, I'll come from another angle
from movie posters and props entirely... Professional Grading...
Bruce once mentioned a while back about the possibilities of CGC
grading for stills, and its impact on the collector's market... including some
That is interesting. My Dracula Style F has the 36312 as well. My
Dracula Style A has 36310. Odd that 2 different styles have the
same litho number. I have never heard of such a thing before.
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
__
In looking over a large photo of the Dracula one-sheet from the upcoming
Profiles In History auction, i noticed that the bottom corner says "Morgan
Litho Co. Cleveland O. 36312", which in and of itself isn't strange, except
that is not the usual copy info I see on posters from that time period,
6 matches
Mail list logo
