Re: [MOSAIC] need proof-real research at-risk kids do not benefit from working with tchr assistants.

2009-10-27 Thread Beverlee Paul
Check Elaine Garan's book of questions and answers. I think it has something akin to this. On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 5:27 PM, kelley dean wrote: > This year our principal has opted to send our weakest students to a room > w/ three teacher's assistants. Prior to this, the highest students were > s

Re: [MOSAIC] need proof-real research at-risk kids do not benefit from working with tchr assistants.

2009-10-26 Thread kelley dean
Thanks, Kelly! will do. On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Kelly Andrews-Babcock < kandrews-babc...@killinglyschools.org> wrote: > Ashley, > Allington's book "What Really Matters in Response to Intervention" is all > research that backs up just what you are saying. Chapter 7 is Delivering > Interv

Re: [MOSAIC] need proof-real research at-risk kids do not benefit from working with tchr assistants.

2009-10-26 Thread Kelly Andrews-Babcock
Ashley, Allington's book "What Really Matters in Response to Intervention" is all research that backs up just what you are saying. Chapter 7 is Delivering Intervention by Expert Teacher. Buy it for your principal with that section highlighted!! Good luck. Kelly AB On 10/25/09 7:27 PM, "kelley

[MOSAIC] need proof-real research at-risk kids do not benefit from working with tchr assistants.

2009-10-25 Thread kelley dean
This year our principal has opted to send our weakest students to a room w/ three teacher's assistants. Prior to this, the highest students were sent while classroom tchrs worked w/lowest five students (30 min.daily). I am strongly opposed to this move. With a reading specialist degree, and nat. bo