Oleg,
If you’re looking for rule based approaches, I would also encourage you to
look at explicitly rule based systems like Apertium
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 2:42 AM Oleg Parashchenko wrote:
> Hello Hieu,
>
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 23:09:25 -0700
> Hieu Hoang wrote:
>
> > the training does add glu
Hello Hieu,
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 23:09:25 -0700
Hieu Hoang wrote:
> the training does add glue rules for non-syntax models but you're using
> a variant with syntax where you have to do it yourself.
I didn't want to use a variant with syntax, I want to try "hierarchical
phrase-based: no linguist
the training does add glue rules for non-syntax models but you're using
a variant with syntax where you have to do it yourself.
DOwnload the small sample model and look in the tree-to-tree example to
see how it's done
http://www.statmt.org/moses/download/sample-models.tgz
Also, I hope you
Hello Hieu,
> ... You always need a glue rule
I assumed that training should create one. If I need to write one self,
where can I read the details? The page
https://www.statmt.org/moses/?n=Moses.SyntaxTutorial mentions only the
using of glue rules.
> Can I have a look at your moses.ini file
I'v
Can I have a look at your moses.ini file. You always need a glue rule
phrase take for scfg models to create the final output
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022, 8:58 PM Oleg Parashchenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've created and tried a hierarchical model:
>
> ```
> $ echo 'nhoj' | moses -f model/moses.ini
> ...
>
Hello,
I've created and tried a hierarchical model:
```
$ echo 'nhoj' | moses -f model/moses.ini
...
Line 0: Initialize search took 0.000 seconds total
Translating: nhoj ||| [0,0]=X (1) [0,1]=X (1) [0,2]=X (1)
[1,1]=X (1) [1,1]=N (1) [1,2]=X (1) [2,2]=X (1)
0 1 2
0 1 0
0
